Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7495 p361
29 March 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 55K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

•  Minor ailment service
•  Locum responsibilities
•  Education
•  The Society
•  Manufacturing
•  White Paper
•  Children's BNF


Letters to the Editor

Education

What recourse is there for bullied students (Mr M. E. Q James)

Reply from Jeremy Holmes, chief executive, Royal Pharmaceutical Society

What recourse is there for bullied students?

From Mr M. E. Q. James, FRPharmS

In browsing pharmacy internet message boards I have encountered some disturbing cases concerning preregistration students who feel badly treated or bullied.

We all complain every so often, but these young men and women are in a peculiarly vulnerable position and it seems that when they seek the advice of the Society the norm is to accept the word of the tutor and, apparently, to dismiss the concerns of the student.

I do not wish to encourage people to complain about conditions at the drop of a hat, as I have been a tutor and can appreciate how situations can deteriorate, especially when only one or two people are involved. I wonder what the process is when the human relationship between tutor and trainee has irretrievably broken down. It cannot surely be accepted as satisfactory that the student simply fails the year and cannot take the examination for a further 12 months, if at all, especially where only one other person is involved, as would be the case in a small organisation.

I have been a tutor in community pharmacy and, looking back, see how easy it would be for a student not to fit in. I have also assisted with tutoring in hospital and recall the gratitude of some students when they came to me, and the relief with which others left. The “some” included students who were regarded elsewhere as less than promising; the “others”, students whom I felt would be good pharmacists but where other supervisors disagreed.

To whom can students or tutors turn when such a breakdown occurs? In the past, I have recommended contacting the local branch secretary. Before I am hoist with my own petard and someone contacts me, what is the process in such case?

Miall E. James
Honorary Secretary
Colchester Branch, Royal Pharmaceutical Society


 

JEREMY HOLMES, Chief Executive and Registrar, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, replies: The Society’s preregistration scheme sets out the standards for the 52-week preregistration training period. The performance standards for preregistration trainees are set out in a workbook and state the outcomes that must be met at the point of registration. There are also standards for tutors and training premises. A tutor information book sets out the responsibilities of a tutor. The tutor is responsible for the delivery of training and assessments that provide the assurance that standards have been met. This training relationship is governed by a learning contract.

The Society plays no part in placing students; students apply for a preregistration post with an employer. Where the employer is not an independent owner, a tutor is assigned by the employer and the Society is notified. The Society has no formal contract with employers or tutors to provide training. The preregistration employment relationship is governed by the terms and conditions of the employment contract.

Although the Society has no legal obligation in this area, we encourage trainees, tutors and employers to follow best employment practice in resolving issues locally. All employers owe a duty of care to their employees to protect them from bullying. When bullying emerges the Society would expect the employers to have in place formal grievance procedures to deal with this — bullying is not something that should be tolerated. The Society’s Code of Ethics makes it clear that all registrants whether they be tutors or employers should demonstrate respect for the dignity, views and rights of colleagues. We expect this to be applied to the tutor/trainee relationship; trainees sign up to this through the learning contract.

The Society is undertaking a number of initiatives in relation to the operation of the preregistration scheme. We recognise that tutors are an important asset and crucial in the delivery of training. We are currently developing tutor support through web-based guidance and training in workplace assessment skills. We also recognise the need to support trainees by developing guidance on addressing training issues in the workplace. This guidance is to be included in the 2008/09 trainee workbook.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Locum responsibilities)
Next Topic (The Society)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal