Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7496 p398
5 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Society elections (2)
• Devolution
• Medication errors
• Children's medicines
• The new contract
• Community pharmacy
• Patient safety
• Responsible pharmacist
• CPPE
• Education
• The Society (4)
• Pharmacy in the media


Letters to the Editor

Medication errors

Reply from Jackie Giltrow, chief inspector and head of regulatory transition, Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Has there been a review?

From Mr P. Walton, MRPharmS

In a previous letter (PJ, 7 July 2007, p18) I complained that Royal Pharmaceutical Society inspectors ignoring error logs so that pharmacists felt free to report errors missed the point of good governance, and that they should only be used to discover the root causes of system errors and not to make pharmacists feel threatened.

In a reply (PJ, 21 July 2007, p72), Graham Phillips stated that there would be a review of the situation in six months.

I would like to know whether this review was ever undertaken. Error logs should be used to remove or reduce the main causes of error and collated information should be used to warn pharmacists of new threats which are causing problems so that pharmacists can avoid getting themselves into career- (or even freedom-) threatening situations.

It seems to me that blaming people when something has gone wrong is far easier than preventing things from going wrong in the first place, which is the route our professional bodies and legal system have taken.

I am heartily sick of the platitudes (rather than action) that have destroyed my belief in protecting myself by operating good governance protocols and procedures.

Philip Walton
Manchester

 

JACKIE GILTROW, chief inspector and head of regulatory transition, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, responds:

The Society supports and encourages the maintenance of medication error logs as part of clinical governance arrangements.

Error logs are intended to be used as a risk management tool and information from the logs should be regularly reviewed, analysed and discussed within the pharmacy in order to identify risk areas. Appropriate action to review systems and procedures with a view to minimisation of future risk should be taken, where necessary.

During inspections, Society inspectors may ask to see evidence that systems are in place to deal with dispensing errors, including the maintenance and use of medication error logs.

Inspectors will seek to ensure that there are satisfactory internal processes to audit and analyse the errors made and for remedial action to be taken if appropriate.

Pharmacists are advised to participate in local, employer and/or national reporting systems to ensure that trend analysis can be undertaken with a view to encouraging wider learning.

If the Society receives a complaint about a dispensing error, the inspector may, as part of the investigation, ask to see the specific error log which relates to the complaint under investigation and to seek to identify the root cause analysis of the error.

As part of the Society’s review of the use of error logs in cases involving single, one-off dispensing errors, a consultation on “threshold criteria” has been launched (PJ, 9 February 2008, centre pull-out section).
(PDF 380K)

Full details of the consultation can be found on the Society website. The closing date for the consultation is 18 April 2008 and the maintenance of error logs is specifically mentioned as evidence of good practice and one of the reasons for non referral of a pharmacist to the Investigating Committee.

Cases of dispensing errors that are not referred are dealt with by way of guidance and advice to pharmacists to ensure that steps are taken to reduce the likelihood of similar errors occurring.

The consultation is indicative of the Society seeking to ensure that proportionate action is taken in such cases in order to serve the public interest.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Devolution)
Next Topic (Children's medicine)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal