Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7496 p390
5 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


MPs slate plans to cut funding for second degrees

Government proposals to cut funding for graduates who want to retrain as pharmacists have been dealt a blow after investigation by a Parliamentary committee.

The conclusions of the House of Commons Select Committee on Innovation, Universities and Skills are good news for academic pharmacists concerned that the changes — which would prevent graduates receiving funding if they enrol on an undergraduate pharmacy degree programme — could damage professional recruitment and threaten the financial viability of some pharmacy schools.

David Taylor, professor of pharmaceutical and public health policy at the School of Pharmacy, University of London, who objects to the changes (PJ, 5/12 January 2008, p14) said this week: “These are very serious criticisms of Government policy which have been raised by this Parliamentary committee.

“I very much hope that all pharmacists will do their best to draw the attention of their local MPs to these valuable recommendations, and ask them to help ensure that the future of pharmacy isn’t damaged, especially in light of this week’s White Paper on pharmacy.”

The MPs’ report, published last week, condemned the Government’s consultation on the changes to funding students who want to take a second undergraduate degree as “inadequately examined”. The decision to cut funding was “insufficiently justified”, it said.

The committee also said that the courses and professions exempted from the new ruling were inconsistent, highlighting the exemption of students studying Turkish, but not those studying pharmacy.

The MPs said that any proposed changes to the funding system should be left to the 2009 independent review of tuition fees.

“In our view, the Government has not shown convincing evidence that the withdrawal of funding for ELQ [equivalent and lower qualifications] students and the phased reallocation of the resources will meet its policy objective to encourage more suitably qualified individuals to start higher education for the first time,” the report says.

The MPs want the Government to bring forward a planned review of exemptions from this December to the summer. They also want to see a full consultation take place as part of the review, which should also consider the financial implications of any changes.

The committee said that the Government should “urgently” produce guidance for students and higher education institutions about the new funding restrictions to clarify the responsibilities of the institutions and who should foot the bill if a student is mistakenly funded.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal