Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7497 p438
12 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 60K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• White paper
• Community pharmacy
• Domain names
• Minor ailment scheme
• Electronic prescriptions
• Hospital pharmacy
• Procurement
• Euthanasia
• Council election
• Health and safety
• The Society (2)


Letters to the Editor

Council election

Alliance Boots takeover at Lambeth?

From Mr N. Baumber, FRPharmS

With the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Council election looming, may I remind pharmacists that the Society exists to represent their interests and not those of organisations that want to wield power and influence by claiming that they pay the membership fees of their pharmacy staff.

We have seen in the past year a frightening level of consolidation and commercial influence in community pharmacy from the amalgamation of retail and wholesale chains in the Alliance Boots organisation. Have we forgotten the advantage taken of us so recently by partnership in the Pfizer Solus scheme, and the damage caused by it to our distribution channels?

There are already two Alliance Boots pharmacists, Steve Churton and Jonathan Buisson, on the Society’s Council, while Paul Bennett, also a senior Alliance Boots employee, chairs the English Pharmacy Board.

In what one can only assume to be a deliberate tactical move, Mr Buisson has chosen to stand not for Council but for the English National Board instead. It seems to me that this paves the way for Nanette Kerr, a new Boots candidate, to take a place on Council.

Might this give Boots undue political influence on the current Council and boards if all four are elected? And might it attempt to bring this to bear as the new professional body is shaped?

Noel Baumber
Grantham, Lincolnshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Euthanasia)
Next Topic (Health and safety)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal