Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7497 p439
12 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 60K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• White paper
• Community pharmacy
• Domain names
• Minor ailment scheme
• Electronic prescriptions
• Hospital pharmacy
• Procurement
• Euthanasia
• Council election
• Health and safety
• The Society (2)


Letters to the Editor

Health and safety

Improve pharmacists’ working conditions

From Mrs L. K. Gilpin, MRPharmS

We have all had days when everything goes wrong — the train is crowded, the coffee is spilled, the prescriptions come in bunches rather than a steady stream, the urgent medicine fails to arrive even though it has been promised and someone is off sick. That is life. We cope.

A certain amount of stress is good for us. It keeps us on our toes, we know we are alive and, at the end of the day, the relaxation is all the sweeter because of it.

But unrelenting stress is different. The kind that wears us down day after day is all too frequent now for pharmacists, who have little control over their working conditions.

In a recent Chemist & Druggist survey, 80 per cent of community locum pharmacists and 76 per cent of community employee pharmacists expected their stress levels to be higher in 12 months time — and this from a pretty high baseline already.

Companies with non-pharmacist area managers seem to be among the worst offenders, insisting that a certain number of medicines use reviews be performed whether appropriate or not and “If you don’t get that number done today, then just get double done tomorrow”.

With the move away from dispensing to other services, the locum or employee is having to do everything they have previously done and everything else on top, often with inadequate and poorly trained staff. These poor conditions of work cannot continue to go unchallenged. They can lead to errors that ruin lives.

I want the new professional body to concern itself with the working conditions and the health and safety of pharmacists. I want it to be proactive and not just wait for a whistleblower to sacrifice his or her own future for the sake of others.

I want there to be, if necessary, a way of reporting anonymously — even through a third party to alert the professional body to where it should shine a light to expose unsafe working practices and put an end to them.

Now that would be a professional body worth joining.

Lindsey Gilpin
New Malden, Surrey
English Pharmacy Board Election Candidate

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Council election)
Next Topic (The Society)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal