Home > PJ (current issue) > News Feature | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7497 p431
12 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 30K, Acrobat Reader

News feature

Pharmacy White Paper widely welcomed

Dawn Connelly (on the staff of The Journal) collates responses from the profession and others to the pharmacy White Paper, which was published last week

Related websites
White Paper “Pharmacy in England — building on strengths, delivering the future


Pavel Seplavy/iStock

Key opens door

The Government’s White Paper “Pharmacy in England — building on strengths, delivering the future”, published last week (see news p423), has caused an understandable stir among the profession.

The 139-page document, dedicated almost entirely to pharmacy, sets out the Government’s vision of future pharmacy services.

It has been broadly welcomed by the profession as a show of faith from the Government.

However, some concerns have been raised about aspects of the White Paper, including how new services will be funded (see Panel below).

Words of caution

In contrast to the generally positive responses, shadow health secretary Andrew Lansley says: “Three years ago the Government made the very same promises as it’s making today — that pharmacists would start delivering more services like screening and would be able to prescribe some drugs to patients.”

He adds: “Labour has dithered and it hasn’t happened. Now they’re trying to package the very same proposals as a new announcement.”

Day Lewis chief executive Kirit Patel also sounds a note of caution: “An increased focus on pharmacy’s potential and making community pharmacy services more responsive to patients is welcome, but there also must be the capacity and the resources to make this happen. We will need further detail from the Government about where the money is going to come from to fund these changes and to ensure that these proposals are cost-effective, have proven health benefits, and make the best and most appropriate use of the community pharmacy workforce.”

CCA and AIMp chief executive Rob Darracott says: “We believe the fair funding approach is the right one, but it needs to be delivered as well as designed, and work needs to be done as a matter of urgency on the contract funding mechanism if it is to be fit for the purpose of supporting the proposals contained in the White Paper.”

John D’Arcy, interim managing director of Numark, argues that the options presented for reform of exemptions for 100-hour pharmacies stop short of what is needed. “We welcome the fact that our members’ views have been listened to in respect of 100-hour pharmacies.

“However, the options for consideration don’t go far enough. The 100-hour pharmacy exemption is frustrating the ability of PCTs to plan local pharmacy services and is placing an unacceptable strain on the global sum.”

Sue Sharpe, chief executive of the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, believes the White Paper is a positive development for community pharmacy. “It builds on the NHS contractual framework, identifying the barriers to developing our role and proposing practical and constructive measures for tackling them. The White Paper includes many innovative proposals and the PSNC will look forward to working with the Government, NHS Employers and others to deliver the benefits we can bring to the NHS as soon as possible,” she says.

Increase pace of change

David Pruce, director of practice and quality improvement at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, says the Society is encouraged that the White Paper recognises the importance of pharmacy’s role but adds that the Society is calling for a greater sense of urgency from the Government.

In addition to increasing the pace of change, the Society would like to see more clarity on how the Government is going to fund the new services. The Society is proposing a set of professional standards to ensure a level of quality for the services suggested in the White Paper.

The National Pharmacy Association describes the White Paper as “a statement of faith in community pharmacy by Government”. However, it warns that there remains a lot of detailed work to be done on the contractual mechanisms that underpin NHS-funded pharmacy services in order to get over the obstacles that are still in the way of an expanded clinical role.

Colette McCreedy, NPA chief pharmacist, says: “The NPA has long asked the Government to give community pharmacy a genuine chance to prove itself in the fields of public health and long-term conditions. The White Paper’s proposals for pharmacy-based vascular risk assessments and for supporting patients with newly prescribed medicines for long-term conditions show that they have listened.

“However, the precise nature of the mechanism to bring about these changes is still to be determined. These matters must be considered carefully, yet promptly, in order to maintain momentum and to minimise uncertainty in the market place. In particular, the commitment to review the 100-hour exemption, although welcome, could lead to considerable disruption in the immediate term.”

The Company Chemists’ Association and Association of Independent Multiple Pharmacies particularly welcomes the Government’s specific commitment to work with the NHS and relevant partners to identify how its world-class commissioning competencies should apply to the commissioning of services from pharmacy.

The joint organisation is also pleased to see the recommendation that commissioners should include community pharmacists in local planning processes and link with pharmacy stakeholders to understand where community pharmacy services can have the greatest impact in meeting the objectives of practice-based commissioning.

Peter Gibson, head of public affairs at Alliance Boots, believes that the White Paper has raised the bar for pharmacy. “The untapped resource has been recognised and at last will be fully used. We especially welcome the recognition that pharmacy’s active involvement and planning at all the relevant stages of interaction with the patient is needed and the plan to raise awareness and promote pharmacy’s role will ensure success.”

Focus on local needs

Kenny Black, managing director of Rowlands Pharmacy, says he is pleased to see an emphasis on delivering services to those who will benefit most, particularly in the area of medicines use reviews. “Focusing on local needs and patient relevance has to be the priority to make best use of our expertise and resources and to ensure the right people are receiving the most appropriate and timely advice and treatment,” he says.

The NHS Confederation, which represents 95 per cent of NHS organisations and is the parent body to NHS Employers, says that the White Paper presents a further opportunity to unlock the potential of community pharmacy.

“In tackling this agenda, the challenge will be ensuring strong working relationships between PCTs and pharmacists. Both parties will need to see themselves as members of a network of local services geared towards improving health,” says Jo Webber, the organisation’s deputy policy director.

The British Medical Association also backs pharmacists’ wider role: “We agree there are many areas in which appropriately trained pharmacists can take on extended roles in primary care and we would welcome this. We believe the overall management of patients with long-term conditions is best done within general practice but pharmacists have a role to play in supporting patients in their use of medicines,” says Laurence Buckman, chairman of the BMA’s GPs Committee.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal