Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7498 p459
19 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Small benefit for antibiotics in sinusitis but consider risks

Antibiotics provide a small benefit in acute sinusitis, but this must be weighed against potential adverse effects for individuals and the population as a whole, the authors of a Cochrane review conclude (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008; issue 2).

The review uncovered five studies involving 631 participants that showed a slight statistical difference in favour of antibiotics in primary care treatment of uncomplicated acute sinusitis, compared with placebo (pooled relative risk 0.66, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.44–0.98). There was some evidence that patients treated with antibiotics improved faster and 90 per cent of patients treated with antibiotics improved within two weeks, but so did 80 per cent of patients given placebo.

The researchers conclude that the small benefit of antibiotics needs to be weighed against the potential for adverse effects, including those associated with resistance to antibiotics among community-acquired pathogens, which may be increased by widespread prescribing of antibiotics and the use of low doses, long treatment durations and broad-spectrum agents.

Three other Cochrane reviews of antibiotics were also published this week. One showed that three days of antibiotic therapy is as effective as five days’ therapy for non-severe pneumonia in children under five years of age.

Another found little or no evidence that antibiotics reduce pain or secondary haemorrhage rates following tonsillectomy, leading the reviewers to advise that caution be used when prescribing antibiotics routinely to all tonsillectomy patients.

A further review found no published data to recommend the optimum duration of treatment with intravenous antibiotics for chest exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. This last issue has important clinical and financial implications, the reviewers stress, and so an adequately powered randomised controlled trial is needed to provide a conclusive answer.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal