Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7498 p459
19 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Switching trimethoprim will not lead to increased resistance

Geoff Kidd/Science Photo Library

Trimethoprim tablet

Making trimethoprim tablets available over the counter will not increase use

Changing the status of a prescription-only antibiotic for the treatment of cystitis to an over-the-counter medicine will not lead to an increase in antibiotic resistance, according to the National Pharmacy Association.

The NPA view follows a warning against the reclassification of trimethoprim from Robin Howe, head of the antimicrobial resistance programme in Wales.

Dr Howe, in a letter to the BMJ (2008;336:787), cautions against changing trimethoprim’s status from prescription-only medicine to pharmacy medicine on the grounds that it could damage public health by triggering antibiotic resistance.

But Colette McCreedy, chief pharmacist and director of practice at the NPA, disagreed. “He is making the assumption that if you make this drug available as a P medicine that it will increase its usage. I don’t necessarily agree that is the case. What I think it does increase, is choice of access.”

She said some pharmacists have already successfully been offering trimethoprim to patients over the counter as part of a patient group direction.

“Although [a patient group direction] is a more structured intervention, I think it is possible to take the learning from that scenario to go forward in community pharmacy.

“This is something which pharmacists can do competently and confidently, provided the training packages are correct and the guidelines from the Royal Pharmaceutical Society are robust,” said Mrs McCreedy.

In his letter, Dr Howe cites evidence from a case-control study examining the risk of an antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli urinary tract infection. The study suggested that the risk of a trimethoprim-resistant infection was associated with the patient having received a trimethoprim prescription in the preceding month.

He pointed out that trimethoprim is a useful alternative to other antibiotics which fail in the treatment of infections such as meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Increased use of trimethoprim could jeopardise that prescribing option, he said.

Dr Howe also said that reclassification goes against recommendations from the EC and a House of Lords select committee which both recommend that systemic antibacterial agents should remain prescription-only treatments.

“Given the ever-increasing restrictions on antibiotic use in hospitals that are being encouraged by the Department of Health in an effort to control resistance and Clostridium difficile, it seems paradoxical to reclassify trimethoprim,” said Dr Howe.

Drug manufacturer Alpharma applied to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in 2005 for the drug to be reclassified for the treatment of cystitis. Consultation on the reclassification is over but the MHRA has yet to reach a decision.

Meanwhile, last month Goldshield Pharmaceuticals applied to the MHRA for nitrofurantoin to be reclassified from a POM to a P for the treatment of cystitis (PJ, 8 March 2008, p266).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal