Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7498 p463
19 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Role in tackling health inequalities put to MPs

Needs assessments

Gaps in provision of health services can be identified by needs assessments

Primary care trusts are ignoring the potential of community pharmacy in helping eradicate health inequality, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society has told an influential committee of MPs.

The Society highlights the use of pharmaceutical needs assessments as a way for PCTs in England to identify the gaps in the provision of community pharmacy services and stresses that PCTs need to carry them out.

The point is made in written evidence from the Society to the House of Commons Health Committee as part of the MPs’ ongoing inquiry into the contribution of the NHS to reducing health inequalities.

The Society acknowledges that community pharmacists have a significant role to play in beating health inequality because of their extended clinical role under the pharmacy contract and their accessibility to patients. But the Society adds: “Pharmacy services are not being adequately commissioned, and where they are commissioned they need to be better integrated with mainstream primary community health services.”

For the NHS to tackle health inequalities successfully the Society believes it needs to “have in place a system that makes the best use of and consistently invests in community-based services it already has. This is not currently happening in community pharmacy.”

The Society also warns MPs that if the NHS vision for the future is to create GP-led polyclinics or merge smaller practices into larger organisations then it is essential that the existing network of pharmacies is “maintained, rationalised where appropriate and expanded where desirable”.

The lack of consistency around PCTs commissioning community pharmacists to deliver primary care services is also highlighted in evidence to the committee by Alliance Boots. The company says that the commissioning of enhanced services under the pharmacy contract is “variable” and is creating a “fragmented system of postcode services across the country”.

One way around this, the company suggests, is for more pharmacy services in the national contract to move from “enhanced” to “advanced” status. This could include services such as sexual health screening; diabetes and weight management, it says.

Alliance Boots adds that it also wanted to see a closer link between “the contractual arrangements underpinning GP and pharmacy services” which it suggests would bring more collaborative working, helping to develop community pharmacy services and enable pharmacists to carry out more clinical duties traditionally performed by GPs.

Lloydspharmacy is also keen to see greater partnership working between GPs and community pharmacists which it suggests could be achieved by offering GPs incentives under the Quality and Outcomes Framework in their contact.

But it also highlights the need for the health service to recognise and accept the role that community pharmacy can play. This could be met, it suggests, through greater integration of the primary care workforce and “formalised through a new primary care contract for service provision”.

The written evidence has been published ahead of the Health Committee’s next meeting on 30 April 2008 when MPs will hear oral evidence to the inquiry, including representation from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal