| • White Paper
• Patient records
• Electronic prescribing
• Pharmacy contract
• Community pharmacy
• Medicines use reviews
• Minor ailment scheme
• Medication errors
• English Pharmacy Board
• Council election
• Education
• Public relations
• New professional body
• The Society (2)
• Euthanasia (2)
Letters to the Editor
|
Patient records
Patients have valid reasons to be sceptical
From Mr J. Silcock, MRPharmS
Your leading article “More
haste, more speed” (PJ,
12 April 2008, p422) suggests that it is essential to make patient health
records accessible
to community pharmacists. From a professional perspective this is correct,
but members of the public often remain unconvinced for a number of valid
reasons.
Pharmacists who simply fulfil a supply function have no need for access to
sensitive personal data, whatever role they may like to have in the future.
The pharmacy environment is often commercial and patients may worry about access
to their data by a variety of part-time staff.
Service changes (for example, repeat collection and delivery) have often distanced
pharmacists from patients who could benefit most from enhanced professional
input. Patients value continuity and may be disturbed by frequent changes in
managerial or dispensing staff.
Data protection has become a highly sensitive issue. I suspect the Government
will act in accordance with the expressed wishes of patients and their representatives.
Pharmacists must demonstrate to patients that they both need data access and
can be trusted with it. This means asking patients more questions and initiating
more clinical interventions within the current contractual framework.
When
patients can see the difference this makes, then the message to the Government
from focus groups and consultation exercises may change. Jon Silcock
Lecturer in Pharmacy
School of Healthcare
University of Leeds |