Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7499 p507
26 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• White Paper
• Patient records
• Electronic prescribing
• Pharmacy contract
• Community pharmacy
• Medicines use reviews
• Minor ailment scheme
• Medication errors
• English Pharmacy Board
• Council election
• Education
• Public relations
• New professional body
• The Society (2)
• Euthanasia (2)


Letters to the Editor

Education

A moral responsibility to tackle bullying

From Mr M. E. Q. James, FRPharmS

I am obliged to our Chief Executive and Registrar for his reply to my letter (PJ, 29 March 2008, p361) in which he endeavoured to answer my concerns about preregistration students who, for whatever reason, find themselves to be incompatible with their tutor.

I welcome the news that the Royal Pharmaceutical Society “is undertaking a number of initiatives in relation to the operation of the preregistration scheme”, and that it recognises “the need to support trainees by developing guidance on addressing training issues in the workplace”.

However, Mr Holmes indicates that the current view is that our Society has and can have no involvement with workplace issues. No doubt, according to the strict letter of the law, he is correct, although our Society has a poor track record when it comes to legal opinions.

For my part, I do not think we can shrug off a moral responsibility quite so easily. We have told the student that he or she must undergo practical training. We have told him or her that such and such a person or organisation has been approved for the purpose. Then, when there is an allegation that the tutor could be found wanting we say “Oh, that’s an employment issue and nothing to do with us.”

That may have been acceptable once but I wonder what a modern employment tribunal would make of it or a High Court judge, if it got to the point where they were asked to look at the principles behind the arrangement.

I fear that, as well as the law, both would look at the fundamentals behind the “contract” and, in those circumstances, even if, as our Chief Executive suggests, they might find for the Society, the terms of the judgment might be such as to set back the best efforts of our public relations department for a generation.

I am certain that we are only considering a minority of students, but I disagree with Mr Holmes when he says it is not our problem.

Students are our future colleagues. One of the marks of a profession is that it looks after its future members. Failing to do so would be both shameful, and to our collective peril.

Miall E. James
Colchester, Essex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Council election)
Next Topic (Public relations)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal