Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7499 p496
26 April 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary

Related websites
Practice-based commissioning resources


Pharmacists’ role in PBC is often peripheral

Pharmacists offer proven value for money in medicines management but their role in practice-based commissioning (PBC) is often peripheral, David Jenner, NHS Alliance official and GP, told the AAH Pharmaceuticals convention in Cape Town, South Africa, last week.

“Practice-based commissioning is about implementing Government policies [in England] through primary care trusts — it is all about 18 weeks and saving money,” he said, referring to the Government target of 18 weeks or less from GP referral of a patient to hospital treatment.

“At the moment, pharmacists don’t have registered lists, you don’t normally have access to the notes, you don’t directly refer to hospital often, and you prescribe little. So in terms of money you are not big players.” This is why, he believes, the Government has come to GPs first.

Dr Jenner said most GPs realise that pharmacists have a proven track record with medicines management issues, such as concordance, compliance, controlling prescribing budgets, prescribing advice and avoiding waste. However, he said that GPs were sceptical about pharmacists’ abilities to deal with complex problems.

“When you start looking at long-term conditions, as you go in you get more and more consultations not about the index condition but about intervening conditions too — the co-morbidities. … These are very murky waters.”

Michelle Webster, national PBC programme lead at the Improvement Foundation, led a commissioning workshop during the convention. She told participants that GPs still had not got to grips with PBC and that there are still opportunities within PBC for pharmacists who persevere and are proactive.

“I can’t stress enough that good commissioning and redesigning services are about relationships. It is about relationship management and it’s about understanding who the key players are,” she said.

“You need to know what their mindset is, you need to know what difficulties they’re facing at the moment, and then decide how you can help them.”

Pharmacy has come a long way

Speaking at the AAH Pharmaceuticals convention, Colette McCreedy, chief pharmacist and director of pharmacy practice at the National Pharmacy Association, called attention to the amount of work that had gone into “re-engineering” the profession.

She said: “If you look at the development of pharmacy practice in Europe, the UK is really [at the] leading edge in pharmacy development. If you talk to a colleague from any of the other EU countries about point-of-care testing in pharmacies, prescribing pharmacists, P medicines that are antibiotics, their mouths drop open. They cannot believe how much progress we’ve made.”

“I think we need to pat ourselves on the back that we have come forward. But, we have asked for this and now we need to deliver.”

She also pointed out: “The business case has to stack up. I think that the negotiations around remuneration are going to be vitally important — because we are businesses as well as clinicians. And I don’t think we should make any apology for that.”

Mrs McCreedy said that she was “rather concerned and slightly disappointed” to see the Royal College of General Practitioners’ comments on the recent White Paper around the need to consider pharmacy’s commercial incentives.

“I’ve not met any GP who will do anything for nothing,” she said. “The business and clinical side of pharmacy is what makes us unique. And that’s what makes us a different choice.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal