Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7500 p535
3 May 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

• Trimethoprim (2)
• Personalised service
• Shambolic procedures
• White Paper
• Workload
• Patents and generics
• Learning@lunch
• Minority languages
• Domain names
• Public relations (2)
• New professional body (2)
• The Society


Letters to the Editor

Trimethoprim

Will switching lead to increased resistance? (Professor R. Finch, and others)

Trimethoprim is not suitable for treatment in pharmacy (Dr C. Edwards and Dr J. Sarma)

Will switching lead to increased resistance?

From Professor R. Finch, and others

The Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection (ARHAI) has noted the recent reclassification of trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin from POM to P (PJ, 19 April 2008, p459).

ARHAI welcomes the improved roles and responsibilities for pharmacists outlined in the English White Paper for pharmacy. ARHAI and its predecessor — the Specialist Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance — were instrumental in the recognition of the important role that antimicrobial clinical pharmacists can play in promoting the safe and optimal use of antimicrobials and has given them active support.

However ARHAI considered the reclassification of antimicrobials from POM to P could increase demand, promote the diffusion of prescribing of broad spectrum antimicrobials and contribute to increases in resistance among target urinary tract and other pathogens.1

If trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin both become pharmacy medicines this may encourage other applications for POM to P shifts of other urinary tract infection (UTI) agents, for example, pivmecillinam, cefaclor, fosfomycin, norfloxacin. This has potential implications for prescribing in the community.

Nitrofurantoin is recommended for the treatment of lower UTIs due to extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). If nitrofurantoin is routinely used in pharmacies this will remove this agent from second-line use by GPs. Indeed, nitrofurantoin may be less satisfactory and may require longer courses of therapy, and thus is considered to be an alternative, rather than a first-line, therapeutic agent for this clinical syndrome.2

If nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim are routinely used in pharmacies GPs will inevitably start to use more broad-spectrum antibiotics for UTIs, in the expectation that patients will have already received trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin. This would almost certainly include quinolones and cephalosporins, which are risk factors for increasing community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Clostridium difficile and ESBL.3–5

Since the first application for change of trimethoprim from POM to P use three years ago, the prevalence of MRSA, C difficile and ESBLs has increased in the community, making it even more important that use of antibiotic agents in the community is suitably controlled and monitored by robust processes.3–5

We would welcome the views of pharmacy staff and, in particular, antimicrobial clinical pharmacists in NHS hospitals who have to deal with targets to reduce MRSA and C difficile infections, and pharmacy staff in primary care trusts who are seeking to address GP prescribing (e-mail esmita.charani@hpa.org.uk).

Roger Finch
Chairman
Jonathan Cooke
Member
Esmita Charani
Pharmacist Lead
Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections

References

1. Hillier S, Roberts Z, Dunstan F, Butler C. Prior antibiotics and risk of antibiotic-resistant community-acquired urinary tract infection: a case-control study. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007;60:92–9

2. Garau J. Other antimicrobials of interest in the era of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and tigecycline. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2008;14(s1):198–202

3. Draft guidance on clostridium difficile (PDF 1.2MB)
(accessed 25 April 2008)

4. Nathwani D, Morgan M, Masterton RF, Dryden M, Cookson BD, French G et al. Guidelines for UK practice for the diagnosis and management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections presenting in the community. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008;61:976–94

5. Howe R. Don’t include trimethoprim. BMJ 2008;336:787


Trimethoprim is not suitable for treatment in pharmacy

From Dr C. Edwards, MRPharmS, and Dr J. Sarma, MRCPath

We agree with Colette McCreedy (PJ, 19 April 2008, p459) that changing trimethoprim from POM to P status may not increase its usage, but there are other reasons why trimethoprim may not be suitable to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) in community pharmacy, even at current levels of use.

We responded to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency consultation document, which proposed the reclassification of trimethoprim, in August 2005 and the main points were re-emphasised in a letter to you (PJ, 13 August 2005, p193). We think that it is worth reminding supporters of this POM to P reclassification of our main concerns:

• In our experience locally, the resistance of urinary coliforms to trimethoprim from samples in primary care has been rising and is now around 30 per cent. Such a significant degree of resistance makes one question its efficacy as a first-line treatment, whether usage increases or not. Although it may be argued that many urine samples sent to laboratories are from a skewed sample of patients who have failed first-line treatment, there are parallels with amoxicillin, which at one time was first-line choice in the management of UTIs.

• About 50 per cent of urine samples have negative cultures and this throws into question the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment for many patients.

• The MHRA consultation document quoted a report of a working party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy that stated that antibiotics could be suitable for self-medication for uncomplicated lower UTIs, provided they are agents indicated only for UTI. Trimethoprim is not such a drug because, as Robin Howe pointed out in his letter to the BMJ (12 April 2008, p787), trimethoprim may be used to treat other infections, including MRSA. Nitrofurantoin would be a more appropriate choice.

Locally, the level of resistance to nitrofurantoin is about 10 per cent. We think this drug is a more suitable agent for OTC treatment of UTIs.

Clive Edwards
Newcastle upon Tyne
Jayanta Sarma
Consultant Microbiologist, Northumbria Healthcare

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Personalised service)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal