Home > PJ (current issue) > Interview

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7500 p540
3 May 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Interview

Pharmacists must work together to influence their IT system suppliers

Pharmacists need to influence the development of IT systems that will support their wider clinical roles, says Sharon Hart, who was recently appointed national clinical lead for medication management at NHS Connecting for Health

Dawn Connelly (on the staff of The Journal) finds out why


Sharon Hart

Sharon Hart

Sharon Hart
Sharon Hart qualified as a pharmacist in 1985 and focused early in her career on medicines management.

In 1990, she became one of the first regional prescribing advisers to be appointed and has worked at both regional and local health authority level.

In 1998, Mrs Hart was appointed head of publications at the Drug and Therapeutic Bulletin.

For the past year, she has been working as a freelance management consultant, which has involved supporting GPs to make the changes required to meet targets associated with medicines management.

Pharmacists have a lot to gain from the National Programme for IT, according to Sharon Hart, a pharmacist and newly appointed national clinical lead for medication management at NHS Connecting for Health (PJ, 8 March 2008, p267).

Mrs Hart was attracted to the role as one of 19 national clinical leads because of her belief in the potential for a national IT programme and her frustration that it has been such a long time coming.

“Unlike many healthcare professionals, community pharmacists have not had access to patient-specific information partly because of a perception that somehow they practise outside the NHS,” she says.

She is confident the flow of information between healthcare professionals made possible by the NPfIT will benefit patients by allowing community pharmacists to perform the wider clinical role that their training encourages and that is envisaged by the Government.

Involving colleagues

The role of the NCLs is to involve colleagues directly in developing the benefits that the NPfIT offers to clinical practice. In her case, this extends to exploring the ways in which the systems and services being delivered by NHS CfH can support and improve medicines management.

Mrs Hart is only a few weeks into her new role but already she has been out fact-finding, meeting local pharmaceutical committee representatives to see what is happening at their level and to find out about early experiences with the electronic prescription service.

“I want to know what people’s concerns are so that I can get a picture of where the challenges are. If the same concerns about the same systems recur then there may be something we can do to expedite them at a national level,” she says.

But it is not the EPS that excites Mrs Hart the most. “Obviously I can see the benefits of EPS but this is just a step along the way to accessing the summary care record, which is what I see as most exciting. The developments that will come next will really allow pharmacists’ input into medicines management. And the information flow will go two ways. Pharmacists will also be able to communicate with other healthcare professionals and patients about medication including the purchase of over-the-counter medicines,” she explains.

However, access to the summary care record for community pharmacists has some way to go yet, with the recent White Paper (PJ, 12 April 2008, p430) indicating that further work will be carried out with early adopter sites to consider the benefits, governance and practical arrangements of community pharmacists having access to the summary care record.

But Mrs Hart is keen for access to happen. “There is a lot of commitment and support for the development of the summary care record,” she says. “Even in groups where there is sensitivity about confidentiality, there is recognition of the need for access to records for the benefit of patients.

Mrs Hart has had a varied career (see Panel). In terms of her NCL role, she believes that her strengths lie in communication, influencing and engagement to develop strategy and change practice. She also has a wide network of contacts in both pharmacy and medicine. She hastens to add that she is not an IT specialist.

“Encouraging people to communicate more effectively and change practice where necessary are my key skills,” she says.

Mrs Hart is the only pharmacist among the NCLs within NHS CfH. “I see it as a really important role, both from the point of view of making sure medicines management issues are represented and ensuring that the right people are involved in influencing and testing at the right stages,” she says.

Her role straddles a variety of work streams across NHS CfH, including the EPS, the e-prescribing programme (in secondary care), the common user interface and the national care records service. In primary care, Mrs Hart believes that a key challenge she faces is getting pharmacists to work together to influence their IT suppliers and make change happen.

“That appears to be the biggest difference between the pace of change between GP and community pharmacy systems,” she explains. “GPs have had to work together on IT issues. They have influenced suppliers to develop and change systems. Community pharmacists have not had to work together in this way but they need to now.”

Mrs Hart says that it is important for pharmacists to understand that they are represented within NHS CfH and that the programmes can deliver real benefits. However, she stresses that it is imperative that pharmacists demonstrate to suppliers that they want to access services such as the EPS and the summary care record.

“The most immediate challenge is optimising systems for delivery of the EPS and developing the software needed for release 2 of the service.” She adds that NHS CfH can help, but the onus is on pharmacists to act so that they can be at the forefront of developing the right systems to support their needs.

Pharmacists may also have to think about whether their working practices need to change to make full use of the new services. “As will happen with all professions, pharmacists may need to evolve different ways of working,” says Mrs Hart.

Action point

If community pharmacists are going to do one thing related to IT within the next month, Mrs Hart recommends that they should find out which pharmacists in their area have the same system and discuss problems and improvements that need to be made. Then, they need to work with the system supplier to address these issues.

This will start the ball rolling in terms of working with suppliers in a co-ordinated way, says Mrs Hart.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal