Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7501 p555
10 May 2008

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Society sets out next steps for professional body

Pharmacists will be consulted on the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s work on a new professional body for pharmacy, according to a briefing document for members, issued by the Society this week (PDF 260K).

Published in response to the Clarke Inquiry’s recommendations on the future body, it sets out its plans for developing the organisation in the lead-up to a January 2010 start-date, when the General Pharmaceutical Council will also begin its work.

Society President Hemant Patel urged pharmacists to take an interest in the transition process: “This is the time where pharmacists can think about their ambitions and what they want from a professional body.”

Mr Patel added that the Society’s Council was still in the process of considering all of the recommendations in the Clarke report. He also confirmed that a prospectus for the new body would be available for members to consider by the end of the year. This work would be undertaken by the transitional committee, he said, working with all the partners wishing to be involved.

“Peace appears to have broken out in pharmacy,” Mr Patel told the press at a briefing in London, “and organisations are working together with the commitment to ensure that the new professional body starts on a sound footing.”

He also said it was a chance “to say goodbye to the policeman role” that the Society has had on account of its regulatory activities.

Jeremy Holmes, Chief Executive and Registrar at the Society, said: “We want to make sure that this new professional body has the support of the profession before it even starts so that we can look forward and do this together, rather than worry about history and conflicting interests.”

He added: “I think it’s very important that we have a professional body that the great majority of pharmacists feel they can be part of. It needs to combine a proposition for that great majority with recognition of the leading edge of pharmacy specialist practice. It needs to do both jobs.”

Mr Holmes said that, with publication of the recent pharmacy White Paper, “pharmacy is now waking up to the fact that the opportunities are immense, and if ever we needed a focused and relevant professional leadership body that caught the imagination of the profession now is the moment we need it”.

Speaking as a guest at the briefing, United Kingdom Clinical Pharmacy Association chairman Catherine Duggan said that many pharmacists pay “over and above to be part of specialist groups already”, but added: “The people I feel we need to work very strongly to attract are generalists who work in community, or in any sector — generalists who may not necessarily find a professional body, as it stands at the moment, too attractive.”

Richard Cattell, Guild of Healthcare Pharmacists president, told The Journal that, with only 18 months remaining to deliver a fully functional professional leadership body, he would not want the consultation process with members to introduce delays. He also suggested that the transitional committee would need external expertise on financial matters and becoming more member-facing.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal