Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7506 p731
14 June 2008


Society summary

These reports are of debates at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s branch representatives’ meeting on 22 May 2008.
Further reports


BRM asks Society to encourage preregistration training providers to increase the opportunities for cross-sector experience for trainees

The branch representatives’ meeting unanimously carried a motion calling on the Royal Pharmaceutical Society to encourage preregistration training providers to increase opportunities for trainees to gain cross-sector experience.

Proposing the motion, James Davies (British Pharmaceutical Students Association) said that many BPSA members had asked for advice about cross-sector experience. But many large multiple companies were stopping preregistration trainees from taking parts in cross-sector experience.

On the advice of the Society, some preregistration trainees in community pharmacy had had their cross-sector experience limited to a single three-hour presentation relating to hospital pharmacy.

Mr Davies said that he agreed with the Council’s comments that the objective of cross-sector experience was not to provide experience of every sector but to ensure that pharmacists were equipped with an understanding of patient care across boundaries. But he did not believe that true understanding of patient care across boundaries can be achieved in a three-hour presentation.

A friend who was a preregistration trainee with a large multiple company had used her initiative to organise a week with a primary care trust and some time in hospital practice to help break down the boundaries. Her tutor thought it was a great idea, but her area manager told her that it was totally inappropriate because the topic was covered in the three-hour training afternoon.

Mr Davies emphasised that the motion was not asking for compulsory cross-sector experience, which was not financially or logistically feasible. It was asking the Council to lobby the big multiples so that those trainees who wanted to do it had the opportunity and were not actively discouraged. At a time when pharmacy was changing rapidly, future pharmacists were looking to the professional body to support them in becoming better pharmacists.

Jheena Bhakta (BPSA), seconding the motion, said that from day one pharmacists were expected to be able to work in either main sector of pharmacy. But if they did not have the relevant experience in both sectors, then it was difficult to do their job as a day one pharmacist.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal