Home > PJ (Current issue) > FIP Congress 2005 | Search
|
This article |
See FIP Reports
FIP Congress 2005
Controlling costs of medicines — how are those used in hospitals paid for?
Pharmacists from four countries gave presentations on paying for medicines in hospitals. A common theme was the difficulty in controlling the cost of medicines and, despite varying approaches to addressing the problem, the lack of a solution. Giselle Gallego, of the University of Sydney, described how spending
on health in Australia is a mix of private and public funds, and
that there are divisions between that funded by the Commonwealth government
and that funded by the individual states. Funding streams are complex
with different public funders and an increasing private sector. Pharmaceuticals,
as in many countries, are the largest growth area in the health budget. Mike Fahey, from Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, said that pharmacists
in the UAE have great opportunities to make a major contribution
to cost control. Lee Vermeulen, of the University of Wisconsin, gave an overview of the US health care finance system, where again there are multiple funders. The government pays for about 40 per cent of health care expenditure and employers fund the remainder. Public funding is further divided through Medicare (which covers the elderly and disabled), Medicaid (for the poor), and specific funding for veterans and others. There is a multitude of “fiscal intermediaries”, for-profit insurance companies that carry the risk and are in contract with providers to reimburse for care provided. Each provider will have contracts with several intermediaries. The arrangements for an individual are complex as they change in relation to factors such as age, employment status and the care setting. There are three main models for reimbursement of hospitals: • Discount fee for service — in which medication charges are reimbursed
at the same rate as other charges Dr Vermeulen described factors accounting for the increased expenditure on medicines. These are increased prices (due to shortages and manufacturers’ consolidation), higher throughput of patients in hospitals and innovation in technology. There are many strategies to respond to these factors including a significant role for a clinical pharmacist. He illustrated a specific example of a prior authorisation programme. In this, for specific medication, the doctor would have to gain pharmacy approval against agreed criteria before prescribing expensive medicines. Carwen Wynne Howells, chief pharmaceutical officer, Wales, summarised the issues in her country. She described the use of reverse auctions (where companies bid against each other by reducing their price) as one component of a widespread approach to cost-containment. There is a difference between the funding stream for medicines in hospital and primary care in that the latter is managed by an allocated drugs budget, whereas hospital medicines expenditure comes out of the hospital’s global income. Expenditure on hospital medicines is about £100m, and on primary care £550m. Various methods are being used to control the increase in medicines expenditure. These include: • Influence through central guidance such as the National Institute
for Health and Clinical Excellence, through horizon scanning for forthcoming
new technologies and medicines and through formularies |