Home > PJ (Current issue) > FIP Congress 2006 | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 (Supplement) F07-F08
October 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 60K, Acrobat Reader

Meetings

See FIP Reports

FIP Congress 2006

Public demand for innovation places a considerable burden on health care providers. The four symposia of the congress's pharmacy practice programme examined innovations in patient treatment, innovative health care delivery, using innovations to improve patient safety (reported by Pamela Mason) and innovations in learning and education (reported by Steven Kayne) and described possible solutions that are being developed

World Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences The World Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, the 66th International FIP Congress, was organised by the International Pharmaceutical Federation in association with the Federal Council of Pharmacy of Brazil.
It took place in Salvador da Bahia from August 26 to 31, 2006

Health care delivery at patients' homes is a unique and innovative opportunity

ARTICLE CONTENTS
Health care delivery at patients' homes is a unique and innovative opportunity

Medicines distribution

Managing innovation


How US hospitals and hospital pharmacies are changing for the future

Tim Chen

Tim Chen: in terms of home care collaboration is essential

Home health care represents a unique opportunity for pharmacists, said Tim Chen, of the faculty of pharmacy at the University of Sydney, Australia, when he spoke at a session that examined new and future changes in health care delivery. He discussed the home as the centre for health care delivery and the pharmacist’s role in home health care.

Home health care refers to the provision of complex pharmaceutical products (eg, home infusion therapy, home dialysis), clinical assessment and monitoring in the patient’s home, he explained. Health care at home can free hospital beds, reduce health care costs, shorten patient recovery times and remove the risk of hospital-acquired infections.

However, the standard of care should not be compromised, and it is important to be sure that the hospital service can be appropriately delivered at home.

In terms of opportunities for pharmacists, in addition to the supply of medicines (eg, oral medicines, infusion therapy, parenteral and enteral nutrition) and clinical monitoring services, pharmacists can provide training and education to patients and carers on the use of medicines and devices.

The boundaries between hospitals and community care settings are disappearing, but this increases the challenge to provide seamless care, he added. Pharmacists can play a key role in helping to ensure the effective transfer of patient information through application of robust documentation systems. Multidisciplinary collaboration is essential and the expectations on the “seven star pharmacist” as care giver, decision maker, communicator, leader, manager, life-long learner and teacher are high, he said.

Dr Chen went on to describe examples of home health care, beginning with Australia’s hospital in the home (HITH) programme, which was developed in the mid 1990s. In this, programme hospital care is provided in the patient’s own home, but patients are regarded as hospital inpatients, receiving the same treatment and they are also seen by a doctor or nurse at least once a day. Types of conditions managed include chemotherapy, cellulitis, respiratory conditions, and kidney or urinary infections.

Evaluation of this programme has shown that it is safe, effective, cost effective and cheaper than non-HITH care. Length of stay for full HITH care is less than for non-HITH) care while length of stay for mixed HITH (mixed with hospital care) is greater than for non-HITH care, although cost does not differ.

Mentioning a recent Cochrane review, “Hospital at home versus inpatient hospital care”, Dr Chen said that this has reignited the debate on the efficacy of this method of care delivery. This meta-analysis of 22 studies concluded there is no difference in outcomes and no cost savings (but with tendencies in a positive direction towards HITH care), though patient satisfaction is higher with HITH care.

Home medicines review (HMR) was the second example of home health care that Dr Chen discussed. HMR represents a good example of how pharmacists can actively contribute to home health care as part of a multidisciplinary team. Australian pharmacists are paid for this service, he said. HMR involves GP referral to the patient’s preferred community pharmacist, upon which the pharmacist visits the patient at home and reviews their medication.

The pharmacist then provides the GP with an HMR report and the GP and patient agree on a medication management plan. Since October 2001, more than 100,000 HMRs have been undertaken by pharmacists, seen by GPs and funded by government with a constant growth in uptake of the service, he added. Patients are mostly older people (aged 65-85 years).

Medicines distribution

Martin Schulz, head of the centre for drug information and pharmacy practice at ABDA, Berlin, Germany, focused on the dispensing costs for pharmaceuticals delivered through different supply channels. Medicines are traditionally distributed from the manufacturer through wholesalers to the pharmacy and then to the patient who presents a prescription for the medicine, he said.

However, the traditional supply chain is being challenged directly by changes in government policies and indirectly as a result of the changing commercial strategies of the pharmaceutical industry, wholesalers and import companies, he added.

He went on highlight the range of alternative routes that now exclude wholesalers or pharmacies, or both. Retailers other than pharmacies can sell several medicines and devices. For example, home care or disease management services include supply of devices and medicines for the treatment of long-term conditions such as diabetes, asthma, cancer, HIV/AIDS and hypertension.

The more widespread application of pharmacogenomics may further change the supply chain for pharmaceuticals. Switches of products from prescription-only to OTC status will also have an influence, he added.

Turning his attention to parallel or cross border trading for medicines and mail order, he said that one company in the middle of Europe has announced its intention to provide 600,000 primary care patients with a unit dose/blister service. Although its system is suitable only for 400 different solid, oral dosage forms of drugs, the company has said that it aims to gain 10 million patients with its service in the coming years. An independent analysis of this service indicates that potential savings for the insurance fund would be €0.35 per blister but expected additional costs to the company would be €2.65 per blister, said Professor Schulz.

Mail order pharmacy, smart card technology and electronic prescriptions will also have an impact on supply chains. Reporting on a survey of 20 mail order pharmacies, Professor Schulz said that nine were associated with “good” performance results (ie, ordering/delivery service, counselling by telephone, home page information), one was “satisfactory” and 10 were “poor”. Mail order is less expensive overall and cheaper for patients. However, it is more expensive for the health plan because the loss of co-payment is greater than savings in ingredient costs and dispensing fees, he added.

In his opinion, these challenges mean that pharmacists in the future will need to develop a strong strategy and an innovative business model with more than one supply chain. He went on to describe an emerging model of “family pharmacies” in Germany. Patients choose their “family pharmacy” from a list of participating community pharmacies and sign up for one year. All medicines, devices and supplements are recorded on the pharmacy computer and provided by this pharmacy with facilities for home delivery and online ordering.

The service includes counselling on the use of medicines, regular checks for contraindications, interactions and compliance, medication review and quarterly medication reports for both patient and doctor with remuneration for advanced services.

Up to June 2006, 87 per cent of community pharmacies in Germany had entered into a contract with the GP association and health insurance company (Barmer) and had been trained to provide such a service. “This system of family pharmacies represents one promising way forward for pharmacists to maintain and control the quality of medicines and their availability to patients — in other words, drugs plus personal service.”

In another presentation, Per Troein, vice-president, strategic alliances, at IMS Health, said that new supply channels such as mail order, home care, specialist pharmacies and hospital dispensing direct to the patient are in most cases driven by financial interest and are only successful if they demonstrate added value. Potential benefits of these new channels include improved patient information, in-depth knowledge of specialty drugs, nursing care, patient convenience and compliance programmes.

However, many people prefer to speak to a human being they trust, ie, their pharmacist, he said. But the standards are increasing, with the need to check for interactions and patient compliance and improve patient convenience in the form of home delivery.

“Community pharmacies are at risk of [not being able to dispense] very expensive drugs and at the same time the loss of patents and growth of generics will reduce prices of other drugs. These financial risks can partly be managed by systems switches from dispensing fees to fees based on service,” he concluded.

Managing innovation

Steve Hudson

Steve Hudson: innovation helps health care to evolve

Steve Hudson, of the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, speaking on the value of practice research in helping to manage innovation, said that innovation is an integral part of service delivery and helps health care to evolve. However, innovations need time to be shown to be safer as well as more effective. Introduction of new treatments or new uses for existing treatments requires the introduction of clinical service innovations. Although new treatments or new uses are evaluated before introduction, clinical service innovations usually need to be put in place before they can be formally evaluated, with practice research rarely preceding their introduction.

Turning to the role of practice research, Professor Hudson said that it helps to demonstrate the impact of treatment change. This then leads to the incorporation of the drug change within clinical services. Teamwork accommodates the changes within general principles of best practice with the result that best practice evolves in response to the changes. Research therefore widens understanding of best practice in response to patients’ needs. Practice research also informs continuous improvement and helps to validate best practice while impacting reproducibility of services.

He went on to provide some examples of research programmes designed at the University of Strathclyde to demonstrate innovations in pharmaceutical care in three areas, namely, cancer chemotherapy, rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes care. Pharmaceutical care plans to record care issues have been developed for all three conditions.

Generation of a database of care issues allows profiling of current services provided by clinical pharmacy specialists in different settings with extension of the care plan concept to community pharmacy. Databases of care issues also help to quantify patient adherence to treatment guidelines, standardise the use of new treatments and allow the collection of aggregate data on patient characteristics, including drug histories and co-morbidity, adverse drug reactions and appropriateness of therapy.

Research is helping to build a Scottish consensus on models of pharmaceutical care, identify patients’ needs and expectations and define pharmacists’ continuing education needs. The research is also expected to improve teamwork between patients and other healthcare professionals. The need for a joint agenda is currently being formalised with partnership arrangements between schools of pharmacy and health service organisations.

“It is my belief that the future of service developments in pharmacy will rely on good practice research and successful health service/university partnerships,” Professor Hudson said.

How US hospitals and hospital pharmacies are changing for the future

Thomas Thielke, director of pharmacy at the University of Wisconsin Hospitals, US, gave a perspective on the hospital of the future and said that “the pharmacy vision must keep pace”. The structure of hospital in the US has changed from a facility providing primarily inpatient services to patients to a health system offering a broad array of services such as ambulatory care (specialty, surgery and primary care), long-term care, home health care, infusion and dialysis centres, outreach services through telemedicine and an extensive retail service portfolio, he said.

Retail service offerings include pharmacy, clinical laboratory services, food, dietary and catering services, occupational therapy and sports medicine, complementary medicine and nutraceuticals, and diagnostic imaging services.

He explained that, to provide these new services, hospitals have been reorganised into strategic business units with a combination of for-profit and not-for-profit corporate structures. These business units will be marketed through various services believed to drive financial margins, such as cancer, cardiology and neuroscience services. Hospitals of the future will invest heavily in information technology, such as electronic medical records across care settings, smart cards and telemedicine, to ensure seamless care.

Shared care agreements and shared governance will exist between medical staff and health systems to ensure evidence-based practice. Evidence-based patient care practices will be shared and marketed across services and care settings, he added. Specialty services will be marketed direct to consumers with outcome data (eg, actual versus expected mortality, hospital incidence of infection, patient satisfaction scores, cardiac and diabetes outcome measures) used to demonstrate safety and improved quality services.

Turning to the pharmacy structure of the future, he said it will mimic the health system structure. Hospital pharmacies will develop new business streams and provide a wide variety of patient care clinical services from inpatient to outpatient to home care to long-term care. The pharmacy service will provide retail pharmacies to act as training sites for pharmacy students, profit centres for the health system and refill centres for robotics.

The pharmacy service will also provide mail order services, infusion centres, telepharmacy services, home intravenous therapy, drug information services, contract management services to small hospitals, care for older people, specialty care (eg, respiratory, HIV, transplant) and pharmaceutical research centres.

There will be increased use of new dispensing technology, information technology and an increased patient care role for pharmacists. “Pharmacists must keep up to date, maintain vision and develop new strategies to enhance their position within the health system,” Professor Thielke concluded.


©The Pharmaceutical Journal