Home > HP (current issue) > News and features / Daily News | Search

PJ Online homeHospital Pharmacist
Vol 11 No 6 p221
June 2004

Hospital Pharmacist back issues

News summary

Related websites
Charter links (more)


Number of hospital pharmacists on Society's Council drops to one

Alison Ewing: the only hospital pharmacist to remain on Council

Only one hospital pharmacist remains on the Council of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society following the recent elections. Helen Howe (née Remmington), chief pharmacist at Addenbrookes NHS Trust, Cambridge, failed to retain her place in the recent elections (she received the most number of votes of the unsuccessful candidates). Alison Ewing, director of pharmacy at the Liverpool and Broadgreen NHS Trust remains on the Council (as her term of office runs until 2006).

Speaking to Hospital Pharmacist, Ms Ewing said that: “While Council members are not elected to represent a particular practice area, it clearly makes sense for the make-up of the Council broadly to reflect the composition of the membership. With roughly 10 to 15 per cent of registered pharmacists working in the hospital sector, having two or three hospital pharmacists on the 24 member Council (21 of whom are elected by pharmacists) seems to be a balanced approach. With only one hospital pharmacist on Council, it is likely that the views of those members of the profession working in secondary care will be heard less often on the various standing committees.” Ms Ewing added that: “I have worked with Helen [Howe] over the past four years to ensure that there is a hospital perspective when needed. It will be extremely difficult to achieve this alone and we must ensure that there is appropriate input by liaising with the Hospital Pharmacists’ Group and Guild of Healthcare Pharmacists when necessary.”

Mrs Howe told Hospital Pharmacist that: “With less direct input, the challenge for hospital pharmacists will be to ensure that their perspectives, information, experience and leadership qualities benefit the Council in other ways.” She also pointed out that the Guild of Healthcare Pharmacists gives pharmacists working in hospitals and primary care an avenue to Government, in addition to that offered by the Society.

Concerns about the way the council decided to petition the Privy Council for a new Charter may well have worked against Mrs Howe during the election — all seven places were won by candidates running under the banner of the “Save Our Society” (SOS) group, the organisation fighting the new Charter. Speaking for the SOS, Council member Douglas Simpson told Hospital Pharmacist that the SOS group has a strong membership focus. “We want to support the membership groups, which we feel have been somewhat neglected in recent times. Although there will not be the same number of hospital pharmacists on Council as before, we will ensure that their needs are well represented,” he added. Graham Phillips, one of the seven SOS campaigners to be elected, has said that the group hopes to field a hospital candidate in next year’s elections.

The new Charter: at the time of Hospital Pharmacist going to press, its fate remains in the balance

At the time of going to press, the fate of the Charter is uncertain. In an action brought in the High Court by the SOS group, the judge ruled that the Society had behaved lawfully when it petitioned the Queen (via the Privy Council) for a new charter. He suggested that the appropriate place to decide whether or not the new Charter is a good thing is the Privy Council.

A letter has been sent to the Privy Council, on behalf of 13 Council members (the 10 declared SOS campaigners and three others) asking them to keep the Charter decision on hold. (The Privy Council had previously decided
not to take the petition process further until the outcome of the High Court action is known). The SOS group have also said that they will appeal against the decision of the High Court, and the annual general meeting of the Society’s members on 12 May carried a motion seeking to reject the petition for the new Charter by 56 votes to 54.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal