Home > HP (current issue) > Meetings | Search

PJ Online homeHospital Pharmacist
2006;13:185
May 2006

Hospital Pharmacist back issues

Meetings

United Kingdom Psychiatric Pharmacy Group

Topical issues affecting the mental health pharmacy workforce were discussed at a recent conference and preliminary results of a new workforce survey were presented.
Ian Maidment, Siobhan Chadwick and Graham Parton report

This article as a PDF (30K)


“New ways of working — delivering the mental health pharmacy workforce” was held in York on 28 February. It was organised by the National Institute for Mental Health in England New Ways of Working team in partnership with the College of Mental Health Pharmacists, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the United Kingdom Psychiatric Pharmacy Group.

Ian Maidment is vice chair of the UKPPG

Siobhan Chadwick is workforce specialist in the New Ways of Working team

Graham Parton is chair of the UKPPG

Graham Parton

Graham Parton: significant variation in mental health pharmacy staff levels across trusts

Delivering the mental health pharmacy workforce

There is a significant variation in the number of mental health pharmacists and technicians working in trusts across the UK, early survey results show.

Graham Parton, chair of the United Kingdom Psychiatric Pharmacy Group, presented preliminary data on the first national survey of the mental health pharmacy workforce carried out since 1996. The survey was commissioned by the New Ways of Working in Mental Health team, which is part of the Care Service Improvement Partnership. A postal questionnaire covering workforce issues, activity and trust dimensions was sent to chief pharmacists or medication management leads in January, and to date 39 out of 80 questionnaires have been returned.

One notable finding is the significant variation in reported staffing levels. The number of pharmacists per trust varied from 0.3 to 16.6 whole time equivalents (mean = 5.2) equating to 0.03 to 1.9 WTE (mean = 0.764) per 100,000 population. Staffing levels for pharmacy technicians showed a similar variation.

Some common themes emerged when chief pharmacists and medicines management leads were asked about clinical activity. Clinical services to community mental health teams were considered to be limited, ad hoc and non-structured. For example, few community teams had access to specialist medicines management advice. Respondents also commented on the difficulties of working with service level agreements with other organisations to provide pharmaceutical services. These included poorly performing services, difficulties in developing robust clinical services and the perception that mental health is a low priority for the provider. Other areas highlighted included problems with recruiting, retaining and training staff and the increasing clinical needs of community teams.

Mr Parton concluded by suggesting that although the results will be forwarded to the Department of Health, the whole pharmacy profession needs to consider the findings —in particular the service organisational aspects of providing robust clinical pharmacy services to community teams.

Other workforce issues

Working in isolation, a limited number of experienced clinical pharmacists and, in some cases, difficulties with services provided from acute trusts via service level agreements are all challenges affecting the provision of mental health pharmacy services, according to Stephen Humphries, associate director of the National Institute for Mental Health in England and chair of the conference.

Dr Humphries described the overall concepts behind the “New ways of working” (NWW) strategy — using staff to the best advantage by ensuring the most appropriate use of each person’s knowledge and skills. NWW is an innovative, collaborative change process, with staff, service users and carers working together to improve practice and quality for a modern and efficient service.

Peter March, associate director of the NHS Integrated Service Improvement Programme described how the ISIP programme aims to help organisations by delivering a single, consistent approach rather than the current systems which are fragmented. Its role is to identify and share evidence-based best practice, benchmarks and measures for performance by understanding the processes for effective change delivery and maximising the benefits from investments in people, process and technology.

The profile of mental health within the modern NHS was discussed by Peter Pratt, chief pharmacist, Sheffield Care Trust. Giving delegates an outline of psychiatric pharmacy in 1980, he suggested that although mental health pharmacy has developed over the past few decades, it is still somewhat of a “Cinderella service” failing to feature in Department of Health strategic pharmacy documents. Mr Pratt pointed out that medication within mental health is emotive and complex with risks including inappropriate dosing, poly-prescribing, and inadequate patient monitoring.

The National Service Framework for mental health, despite not mentioning pharmacy, acknowledges that clinical teams may lack medicines management skills. Mr Pratt maintained that pharmacists within such teams need to develop relationships with patients, carers, prescribers, other professionals and the pharmaceutical industry, and understand that different groups may have different viewpoints regarding the risks and benefits of treatment. He calculated that for every clinical team to have access to an experienced pharmacist the average mental health trust would need to employ 40–50 pharmacists.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal