New era for technicians
There has never been a better time to become a profession, was the message
given to pharmacy technicians by Keith Ridge, the recently-appointed
Chief Pharmaceutical Officer for England, during what was effectively
his inaugural speech.
Patients are now more informed and more demanding and want health professionals
to work in partnership with them, Dr Ridge said, with risks and benefits
being shared. There are still challenges. These include some awareness
that patients do not believe that they are given enough information about
their medicines. For example, in 2004, 43 per cent of inpatients, 39
per cent of outpatients and 49 per cent of accident and emergency patients
said they were not given any information about possible side effects
and, in 2005, only 37 per cent of mental health patients said they were
definitely told about possible side effects (according to work carried
out by the Picker Institute).
There is also a need to move services nearer to patients, as set out
in the NHS Plan 2000. In particular, half of hospital outpatient appointments
could take place in a community setting, particularly in specialities
such as nose and throat, urology and gynaecology, Dr Ridge suggested,
referring to the recent White Paper “Our health, our care, our
say — a new direction for community services”.
Because of these and other changes that are being made to the professional
environment, regulatory systems need to adapt. Regulation needs to be
fair to the professional, but sufficiently stringent to prevent incidents
such as those involving Harold Shipman. It is with this in mind that
the
Section 60 Order has been brought in, Dr Ridge explained. The draft “Pharmacists
and Pharmacy Technicians Order 2006” represents the biggest change
to the pharmacy profession for 50 years, moving its regulatory environment
more in line with that of other health professionals, Dr Ridge said.
Proposals include those associated with education and training, such
as a requirement for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians to undertake
continuing
professional development. Also in the draft Order are provisions for
the Royal Pharmaceutical Society to be given improved capacity to address
fitness to practise issues. The current statutory committee will be replaced
by two committees — one dealing with disciplinary issues and another
with health-related matters — which will have a wider range of
sanctions available to them than currently exist, such as placing conditions
upon a pharmacy professional’s registration.
Three new committees are also proposed — covering the investigation
of CPD matters, education and registration appeals. Another proposal
includes an “attitudes and behaviours” requirement for registration
(in addition to an initial assessment of good character). “In my
view, this is a good thing,” Dr Ridge said, “in order to
ensure that future practitioners have a real sense of
professionalism.”
Commenting on the proposal not to include the registration of technicians
working in Scotland in the draft Order, Dr Ridge said it was a pity but
suggested that there is a logic to this outcome given that pharmacy technicians
are part of a new profession since their register was created after devolution. “We
will do our best to ensure collaboration continues,” Dr Ridge added.
Dr Ridge concluded by wishing the profession of pharmacy technicians
well. He stressed that the pharmacy technicians whom he has met and worked
with have all been sensible and practical people. “Please do not
lose sight of that common sense approach as you develop your professional
careers,” he urged.
Pharmacy technicians: adaptable and innovative
What are the similarities between Alf
Garnett and pharmacy technicians, was one of the questions posed by Darren
Leech, immediate past president of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians
UK. Not many, being the obvious answer. The character from the 1980s
situation comedy programme “In sickness and in health” (the
conference title) found coping with change particularly difficult,
Mr Leech said, whereas pharmacy technicians have proved to be adaptable
and innovative. Their role has evolved, so that they are now a critical
member of the health care team, with a direct impact on patient health
and a knowledge and competency that has developed over the years. This
is of benefit to patients as well as technicians, Mr Leech stressed.
Part of adapting to the new era includes the registration of pharmacy
technicians. Commenting on the absence of a provision to register technicians
working in Scotland in the draft Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technician’s
Order 2006, Mr Leech stressed that APTUK’s position was that “it
would not be giving up the fight”. However, whatever the outcome,
it is important that pharmacy technicians do not lose sight of their
core business, which is the care of patients, Mr Leech added.
New roles for pharmacy technicians in promoting better use of antimicrobials

Health care-associated infections cost the UK economy approximately £1bn
per year |
Health care-associated infections cost the UK economy about £1bn
a year, and technicians are well-equipped to play their part in reducing
this wastage, according to Helen Gisby, specialist clinical pharmacy
technician at East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust.
Reasons why there are so many health care-associated infections include
an increase in the incidence of serious illnesses, an increase in the
use of in-dwelling devices, high bed-occupancy rates, increased patient
movement, lack of good hygiene practices and inappropriate use of antibiotics.
Tackling the latter of these is the main focus of Ms Gisby’s role.
Her work includes monitoring antibiotic use and setting up appropriate
audits, Ms Gisby explained. At East Kent NHS Trust, the use of 17 (initially
13) different antibiotics is monitored each month at each of the three
acute sites that comprise the trust and across each directorate. Data
is presented as defined daily doses, as recommended by the World Health
Organization, and is used to highlight problems and develop policies,
she explained. For example, data showed that there was a particularly
high use of ceftriaxone at one site, where there was also a high incidence
of Clostridium difficile infection. The instigation of a policy to restrict
ceftriaxone use brought down C. difficile infection rates.
An inappropriate use of intravenous ciprofloxacin was also revealed,
and a policy to allow pharmacists to switch patients from IV to oral
ciprofloxacin was brought in. It is estimated that this could save the
trust up to £90,000 per year, with the IV drug being 600 times
more expensive than the oral drug, and also requiring more nursing time
to administer.
Moving on to other aspects of her role, Ms Gisby explained that she had
helped produce a “pocket size” version of the trust’s
antimicrobial and surgical prophylaxis guidelines, which have been circulated
to all wards, are available on the trust’s intranet and are also
distributed to junior doctors on induction. An “antibiotics awareness
week” in November 2005, where patients and doctors were made aware
of the importance of appropriate antibiotic prescribing, was another
trust initiative.
Ms Gisby spends more time working on her own than she did before when
she was a ward-based clinical technician, which can be challenging. Volume
of work is another issue — “there is only one of me for 1,600
beds,” she said. A multidisciplinary approach is vital — she
liaises with the trust’s director of pharmacy and chairman of the
drugs and therapeutics committee, secondary care
prescribing advisers, and others. She also meets with the trusts’ four
consultant microbiologists every four to six weeks.
Ms Gisby explained that her post was set up in November 2004, initially
for 18 months, and was funded from monies received from the Department
of Health as part of its clinical pharmacy initiative. Future plans,
if trust funding allows her to continue her role, include looking at
ways to improve antibiotic documentation — for example, introducing
a specific section on the trust’s drug chart to include information
on diagnosis when antibiotics are prescribed. Implementing an intranet-based
referral system between pharmacy staff and microbiologists is also planned,
there being such a database running already at St Mary’s Hospital,
London [Editor – see Hospital
Pharmacist 2006;13:131-2 PDF (50K)]. Following through initiatives into
a community setting and carrying out an audit of antibiotic use in older
people are
other potential developments, she added.
As far as she is aware, Ms Gisby is one of about eight technicians who
are involved in promoting better antibiotic prescribing. She would encourage
other technicians to take on this type of work. “It is an interesting
and varied role with excellent opportunity for learning and development,” she
concluded.
New APTUK president has been elected
Sarah Wilcox, senior technician for training and development at the
University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff has been elected president of
the Association of Pharmacy Technicians UK. The position of vice-president
is currently vacant.
Those nominated to serve as national
officers are:
· Joanne Taylor, employee relations
officer (community sector), Jamieson’s Pharmacy, Birkenhead, Merseyside
· Suki Tagger, employee relations officer (NHS and other sectors), previously
at Warwick Hospital
· Tess Fenn, education and development officer, pharmacy NVQ and technical
staff development manager at Guy’s
and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation
Trust
· Vanessa Eggerdon, publicity officer, principal for pharmacy technician
education and training at Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
· Alison Hemworth, branch and projects officer (a newly-created APTUK
post), prescribing support technician at
Bradford South and West Primary Care Trust
· Rachael Lemon, editor of the
Pharmacy Technician Journal, specialist medicines management technician
at Poole Hospital, Dorset
· Catherine Davis, honorary treasurer,
a pharmacy technician training
consultant
Reducing work-related upper limb disorders

Christine Wilson, standing with her prize-winning poster at the
APTUK conference |
Christine Wilson, a senior technician at the University Hospital of
Wales, part of the Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, has won the APTUK poster
award, sponsored by AAH Hospital Services, for her project about reducing
the incidence of work-related upper limb disorders (WRULD). In 2003,
when the project started, 90 per cent of staff carrying out aseptic manipulations
at the trust’s unit presented with some form of WRULD (an umbrella
term to describe various muscular skeletal conditions that are caused
by carrying out repetitive tasks), with 25 per cent requiring some form
of surgery. Mrs Wilson identified a number of reasons behind this, including
that:
· Trays of products to be prepared had to be held in one hand because
the “exit” and “entry” hatches on the
isolators were difficult to open
· The inward and outward hatches of the negative pressure isolator were
difficult to open and the bar underneath this equipment prevented operators
from sitting comfortably
· Preparation of some products required a “squeezing” action
· Manual filling was still required to
prepare a number of syringe products
Following on from the investigation, measures taken to counter WRULD
included changing the skill mix, with assistant technical officers (ATOs)
being trained to prepare doses and technicians being trained in supervisory
and checking roles. This means that there are now more people who can
prepare products and so a rota, where the maximum amount of time an operator
can spend preparing products in a cabinet is one hour (usually per day,
or per morning and afternoon if the workload is particularly high), has
been introduced. More automation (ie, pumps for filling 50ml syringes)
is also now being used. In addition, an ergonomic assessment was carried
out. Based on this, some existing isolators were modified, and some new
isolators and chairs were bought.
All these changes have meant that levels of WRULD have been reduced to
10 per cent and staff morale has increased, because less time is lost
to sickness.
“Focus on technician” articles
Any pharmacist or technician who is is involved in
any new developments in
work undertaken by technicians is asked
to consider writing an article for
publication. Advice on the publication process can be obtained
by telephoning the editorial office on 020 7572 2425/2419. Articles
can be sent by post to Hospital Pharmacist,1 Lambeth High Street,
London, SE1 7JN, or submitted by e-mail to
hannah.pike@pharmj.org.uk or
rachel.graham@pharmj.org.uk |
|