|
|
![]() |
Assessing junior doctors — how pharmacists can be preparedBy Barry Jubraj, MSc, MRPharmS, MCPP
SUMMARY Recent changes in junior doctor training and assessment have presented opportunities for hospital pharmacists to develop their relationships with medical teams. As part of their training, junior doctors must now ask their colleagues, who may include pharmacists, to complete an assessment, scoring the trainee on their progress. New curriculum for doctors Training for newly-qualified doctors was revised last year and now consists of a two-year foundation programme that is linked to the General Medical Council’s “Good Medical Practice” guide. It incorporates the pre-registration house officer year and the first year of senior house officer training. Junior doctors are now known as “F1” (foundation year one) or “F2” (foundation year two) trainees. The terms “junior house officer” and “senior house officer” are being phased out accordingly. The foundation programme curriculum consists of core competencies that trainees will be formally assessed against, and a syllabus that sets out the specific knowledge, skills and attitudes to be developed. A number of assessment tools have been developed for use in the foundation programme, including multi-source feedback (ie, input from a number different colleagues), direct observation of the doctor-patient interaction and case-based discussion. One assessment tool, called the Mini-Peer Assessment tool (“Mini-PAT”), is already being used by pharmacists to assess junior doctors, and is an example of multi-source feedback. |