Home > HP (current issue) > News and features / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeHospital Pharmacist
2006;13:269
September 2006

Hospital Pharmacist back issues

News summary


Medicines management reflects trusts' strengths and weaknesses

Controlled Drugs

Controlled Drugs management is an area in which trusts need to improve

Pharmacy input is essential for good medicines management in hospitals, a new review indicates.

Results from the Healthcare Commission’s medicines management review, part of the NHS annual health check, were published recently, assessing all 173 acute hospital trusts in England on different aspects of medicines management.

Trusts were assessed on 21 indicators, grouped under the three themes of patient focus, clinical focus and efficiency and capability. For example, trusts were assessed on the percentage of patients who had a medicines review within 24 hours of admission and who had a complete medicines record for their stay in hospital. Some of the other indicators are shown in the box below.

Overall, 18 trusts were rated “excellent”, 70 were rated “good”, 73 were “fair” and 12 were “weak”. Since the review is based on relative assessments, an overall assessment of “weak” implies that the trust is lagging behind other trusts those areas, but does not in itself suggest unacceptable practice. Similarly, trusts scoring “excellent” are ahead of other trusts but may still have scope for improvement.

“Involving pharmacists in patient care” was one of the indicators of good performance. Of the 12 trusts rated as being weak overall, 11 performed badly in this area.

The Healthcare Commission says that pharmacists should help develop best practice on wards in order to ensure medicines are being used for most benefit and to minimise medication errors. It says: “Hospitals need to invest in automation of dispensing and find new ways of working so pharmacists can spend sufficient time on wards and in the management of medicines.”

Trusts were awarded one to five points for each indicator, one being the lowest. Overall, trusts scored poorly on Controlled Drugs management, with 85 per cent getting just two points. They were assessed on the percentage of pharmacy stock CD destructions which are witnessed, the percentage of target CD audits undertaken, and transport policies in place for the internal and external transfer of CDs. However, trusts scored well on “effective barriers to prevent prescribing/ administration errors relating to allergy”, with 73 per cent scoring four or five points in this area.

Ray Fitzpatrick, chair of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s Hospital Pharmacists Group, commented that making medicines management part of trusts’ performance rating supports the view that it is an important part of patient safety. He added: “In the interest of patient safety, quality of care and effective use of resources, the NHS must invest in hospital pharmacy services if all trusts’ are to achieve the best standards.”

A national report, outlining the full findings from the medicines management review will be published later in the year.

The report and individual trust ratings, plus details on the scoring methodology (PDF 280K).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal