Less than half of registered supplementary prescribers are using
skills, research says
Less than half of hospital pharmacists who have registered as supplementary prescribers are carrying out prescribing activities, according to a recent study published in the The Annals of Pharmacotherapy (2006;40:1843–50).
Researchers from The Robert Gordon University, the University of Aberdeen
and NHS Education for Scotland sent surveys to all (518) pharmacists
who were registered as prescribers as of June 2005. Of the 160 hospital
pharmacists who responded, 46.3 per cent had practised as a supplementary
prescriber since qualifying. For all pharmacists (ie, regardless of employment
sector), the corresponding figures were 401 and 48.6 per cent.
Further analysis by employment sector was not presented in the paper
but Derek Stewart, senior lecturer in pharmacy at The Robert Gordon University
and one of the paper’s authors, told Hospital Pharmacist that the
main reasons given by hospital pharmacists who were qualified as prescribers
for not practising prescribing were that his or her organisation did
not recognise supplementary prescribing (26 respondents), staff shortages
(12 respondents) and lack of time to devote to supplementary prescribing
(11 respondents). Other reasons cited included recently changing jobs,
supplementary prescribing not being applicable to his or her (sometimes
new) role, difficulties with clinical management plans, being on maternity
leave and waiting for the rest of the team to finish their training.
The biggest perceived benefit of prescribing was better patient management,
with job satisfaction, better recognition and greater independence also
being cited. Hospital pharmacists’ median confidence score when
writing their first prescription was “4” (in a range of 1
to 5), the same as for pharmacists as a whole. Cytotoxic agents, antiretroviral
drugs, antiemetics and anticoagulants were the most commonly prescribed
items on a first prescription.
Dr Stewart added that he does not think that the percentage of pharmacists
registered as prescribers who are practising this activity will have
changed much since June 2005. “Independent prescribing may assist
some …”, he said, “as this will reduce some of the
paperwork associated with a clinical management plan for every patient.”
In
a separate development, researchers from Mid Cheshire NHS Trust and Keele
University analysed attitudes towards supplementary prescribing
among pharmacists,
nurses and doctors. The main resistance to pharmacist prescribing cited by doctors
and nurses was that pharmacists do not have sufficient knowledge of individual
patients. The authors (Buckley et al) conclude that their results “suggest
divergence between the image of pharmacists in the eyes of medical and nursing
clinicians, and pharmacists’ own self image and aspirations for practice
development”. The study is published in The Pharmaceutical Journal (2006;277:394–8) |
|