Int J Pharm Pract 2000:8:237-46
Department of Social Pharmacy, The Royal Danish School of Pharmacy,
Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark L. S. Nørgaard, PhD(pharm),
assistant professor E. W. Sørensen, MSc(pharm), associate professor J.
M. Morgall, PhD, associate professor
Correspondence: Dr Nørgaard lsn@dfh.dk
|
Original Papers
Social constructivist analysis of a patient medication record experiment
why a good idea and good intentions are not enough
LOTTE S. NØRGAARD, ELLEN W. SØRENSEN and JANINE M. MORGALL
Objective To explain the limited success of a local
patient medication record (PMR) experiment in pharmacy practice in Denmark
from a social constructivist perspective and to promote a discussion among
pharmacy practice researchers of how on-going social constructivist analysis
can be used to manage experiments in pharmacy practice.
Method A secondary social constructivist analysis
of data collected during and after a local experiment on the development
and use of PMRs. Data were analysed using three specific social constructivist
concepts. The data consisted of 93 qualitative interviews with elderly
medicine users with a PMR, 10 qualitative interviews with representatives
from health professionals participating in the experiment, and documentary
evidence from a research report.
Key findings Eight relevant social groups were identified
in the PMR experiment. The groups attached different meanings to the same
PMR, such as: threat; totally useless; important tool for preventing drug-related
problems, promoting interdisciplinary co-operation and carrying out pharmaceutical
care; unnecessary interference in private affairs; security; good checklist.
The relevant social groups also had different opinions about responsibility,
duty to inform patients about the PMR, and need for and co-ordination
of the PMR.
Conclusion The analysis supports an important social
constructivist point, namely, that the outcome of a technological development
is not given a priori; rather, it is driven by the interests of various
social groups. Ongoing identification and assessment of these social groups
is recommended to focus future experiments.
|