![]() |
Medicines Management |
|
Features |
Ways to reduce the use of anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs in primary care
The mental health national service framework requires doctors to justify prescribing outside clinical guidelines. The use of hypnotics and anxiolytics is measured nationally as a high level performance indicator. These drugs are only recommended for short-term use, ie, between two and four weeks, yet are frequently continued long-term. Long-term use can cause anxiety, sleeplessness and falls. One practice in the west Midlands had a high proportion of patients dependent on these drugs and, inspired by Northern and Yorkshire regional drug and therapeutics centre drug update no 14 (Feb 2001), wanted to try and reduce this. The idea was quite simple: all patients taking temazepam, nitrazepam, diazepam and the "Z" drugs (zopiclone, zolpidem etc.) were sent a letter explaining the disadvantages of taking these medicines regularly and that to stop them, they would need to be reduced slowly. (A sample letter is opposite but it could easily be adapted to suit different practices.) The GPs also decided that they would like to reduce the quantity of these drugs prescribed by half so that patients would have fewer tablets in their houses. They could still continue on them, but would be encouraged to discuss when that was appropriate with their GP. The practice pharmacist discussed with the GPs how patients could be supported to withdraw slowly and be swapped to diazepam where appropriate. For patients over 85 years old, the GPs decided on an individual basis what action to take and whether or not to send them a letter. In total 173 patients were sent letters and had their medication reduced to a two-week supply. Six months later, looking at a sample of patients, 26 per cent had stopped their medication altogether, 39 per cent continued to receive half the original dose once a month and 35 per cent continued on them regularly. ePACT data confirmed a reduction: the quantity of hypnotics and anxiolytics prescribed in this practice has reduced by a third compared to last year. So what lessons can other pharmacists and practices learn from this experience? 1. Have a go at what others have done before As it worked for us, it may work for you. If it does not, then at least you have tried and you can share and discuss with others reasons why it might not have.
2. Listen to the practice administrative staff and ask their advice about how to approach patients I was too enthusiastic and wanted to send all the letters at once. The practice recommended sending about 35 letters a week over three months so that it would only mean a few extra appointments for the doctors each week. Feedback each week from practice staff meant that the wording of the letter was changed four times to make it clearer for patients. Comments from practice staff can be seen in the panel on the right. 3. Tell local community pharmacists what you are doing Community pharmacists needed to know what was going on because they would potentially have to deal with complaints from patients. I explained why the project was being done and asked for their support. The clinical information given to the GPs about reducing slowly was shared with the pharmacists, too, as were the excellent results. 4. Do not give up When you hear about patients moaning about something you are trying to change, it can be discouraging. Instead, share a success story at the practice meeting to keep spirits up. 5. Do not assume the GPs know everything It was useful revision to go over the BNF guidelines for swapping to diazepam and reducing it. Discussion The project has proven to be successful at reducing the prescribing of hypnotics and anxiolytics to patients in one practice. These results compare favourably with a number of published audits. Reducing the dose of these addictive drugs has many benefits. These include lowering the incidence of side-effects among which are potentially disabling falls by patients.
|
Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs Classifieds | Site
Map | Contact us
©The Pharmaceutical Journal