What pharmacist prescribers can learn from those who have gone before
| Pharmacists currently undertaking
supplementary prescribing training can learn a great deal from
the experiences of health professionals who have gone before them.
Olivia Timbs reports from the British Pharmaceutical Conference
held in Harrogate in September |
British Pharmaceutical Conference reports
and links |
Olivia Timbs is Editor of The
Pharmaceitical Journal
|
Now that the first pharmacists have embarked on supplementary
prescribing training, Professor Judy Cantrill revealed at a session at
the last month’s
BPC that there is a body of research that pharmacist prescribers should
be aware — in order to avoid some of the traps into which others
had fallen.
How doctors do it
Professor Cantrill, of the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences,
University of Manchester, drew attention to various pieces of research
that revealed that much of GP prescribing is irrational, unscientific,
inappropriate and unnecessary. A paper published as recently as this
year confirmed that GPs admit that one in five prescriptions are not
necessary.
Other research has revealed that the reasons for this include patients’ demands
and expectations, and the fact that effective prescribing is time-consuming.
Prescribing is not considered a risky intervention by junior doctors.
In addition, little attention is devoted to therapeutics for medical
students and their prescribing skills are not assessed at all at undergraduate
level.
How nurses do it
Lessons can also be learnt from nurse prescribers. The programme started
to be rolled out in a significant way from 1996 onwards. As of a year
ago, nearly 22,000 nurses were able to prescribe, but currently only
about a half are
actually doing so. “We do not want to see pharmacists getting into
that position,” Professor Cantrill emphasised.
One of the reasons is that nurse prescribing was not linked to local
needs — something that has been dealt with explicitly with pharmacists’ training:
anyone applying for a place on a course has to demonstrate there is a
patient need. The impact of not putting into practice a skill you have
just learnt is well recognised: if you do not do it you quickly lose
the competence and confidence to try.
Those nurses that do prescribe tend to prescribe wound care products.
They express some anxiety about prescribing for the very young and the
very old (incidentally an anxiety shared by doctors); a lack of adequate
clinical information on which to base the prescribing decision; a reluctance
to prescribe for patients not well known to the nurse; and, just like
doctors, they feel under pressure from patients — either because
the prescription requested is unnecessary, or the reason patients want
the product is to avoid having to buying it OTC.
In addition nurses are fearful that they might be missing a serious diagnosis — they
are happy to prescribe provided they know that the diagnosis has been
made elsewhere first.
Nurses who prescribe do so from a limited range of products with which
they are already familiar (pharmacists, on the other hand, will be familiar
with a much wider range of products). But because nurses do not have
experience with products they do not have the confidence to prescribe
them and they worry about litigation. In the early stages of prescribing
they like the support of their peers and like to talk to other nurse
prescribers.
Another significant factor, and one which links back to what doctors
find, is that they do not have enough time. Nurses find every stage of
prescribing takes time: they check everything in the British National
Formulary. Some even deny — in busy clinics — that they are
prescribers: they will claim they are not allowed to prescribe a particular
product and tell the patient to go to the GP instead. They also find
it hard to deal with the paperwork as they do a great of prescribing
in patients’ homes and need to record what they have done in the
patients’ notes held at the surgery.
What do patients want
What do patients want from a prescriber? They want a professional who
is competent, who offers continuity of care and a personal service,
and they want total support. This does not necessarily mean they need
a doctor. But with more professionals prescribing steps must be taken
to ensure that care does not become fragmented and
patients end up having to consult a different person for each condition.
Lessons for pharmacists
So what are the main lessons for pharmacists? It is crucially important
that prescribing pharmacists prescribe on a regular basis — so
they retain both confidence and competency. Contin-uing professional
development is
essential, and in the early stages, and for lone practitioners, peer
support networks need to be put in place.
“And remember you are not prescribing for a clinical management plan,
you are prescribing for a patient,” Professor Cantrill concluded. |