Home

Prescribing & Medicines Management
Issue no 6, p9-10
November/December 2003


Features


Update on Ask About Medicines Week

See also "Ask About Medicines Week" links

Ask ABout Medicines Week logoGabby Clezy was closely involved in Ask About Medicines Week in Surrey. Here, she wonders whether it was a great success — either nationally or locally


Gabby Clezy, pharmaceutical adviser, East Elmbridge and Mid Surrey PCT
Gabrielle.Clezy@eeandms-pct.nhs.uk

Following a frantic period of planning and implementing the Surrey initiative it is timely to sit back and reflect on what we learnt by the exercise and how this could shape any future programmes.

Local campaign

As reported in P&MM (July/August 2003) I worked in collaboration with Sally Greensmith, community pharmacy facilitator in west Surrey and member of Council of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. We designed a local campaign, which was meant to be fun, driven by a multi-professional team and led by pharmacists. Sally and I provided the support materials and gathered a willing band of volunteers. The five primary care trusts in Surrey were allocated one day of AAMW and were encouraged to use our materials to stimulate local initiatives. By publicly reporting the planned campaign we were required to live up to our promise and achieve everything we had set out to do. Small teams distributed leaflets wearing white T-shirts emblazoned with the bold orange AAMW logo. Our leaflet gave examples of questions patients could ask a health professional, along with useful advice around medicine taking.

Each PCT has its own agenda but all embrace the theory that the patient must be at the centre of medicines initiatives if we are to achieve good medicine management. With the PCTs on board, and individual pharmacists and members of the PCT staff volunteering to distribute our leaflets, we were on our way to a successful local campaign.

Epilepsy was one area the national campaign highlighted. To support this Surrey held a communication training evening two weeks before the official week. This was attended by over 50 professionals and sponsored by MSD and Astra Zeneca. A specialist in epilepsy from Guildford Hospital gave a clinical overview of the condition and its treatment while the nursing lead from the National Centre for Epilepsy woke participants up to the realities of life as a teenager with this condition. Alcohol, sex and recreational drug use were discussed as well as strategies for parents and professionals in discussing these with patients.

To communicate our message and raise the profile of the week press briefings were sent to local papers and national pharmaceutical magazines. The key to gaining an editor’s attention is to offer them a prepared piece — including photos. Medical jargon must be avoided and bullet point issues, along with a sprinkling of statistics, will ensure that your article receives the attention it deserves.

The Surrey campaign was also covered on local radio with Mrs Greensmith giving interviews to both the BBC and County Sound. On the Monday afternoon, half-an-hour question and answer session run by a pharmacist appeared on BBC Southern Counties. All this was good publicity for the week as well as raising the profile of pharmacy.

National campaign

The national campaign provided a credit card-sized prompt card for patients with tips on how medicine users can make the most of conversations with a health professional. This was sent to all pharmacies before October. The cards were well received in our area and our teams gave these out in addition to our specially designed leaflets. General practices, hospitals and pharmacies received copies of our local poster and leaflets. The volunteers believed that more could have been done nationally to promote the week — increased national press coverage and possibly stand material suitable for local road shows.

Target sites included hospitals, shopping centres (permission is usually required from centre managers before any distribution), high streets, drop in centres, railway stations and charity shops. The volunteers had differing levels of confidence in meeting the general public with the more outgoing types relishing the opportunity to walk the streets chatting to strangers. Others felt more comfortable spending time at a stand where the public approached them.

This more traditional role could be used to run medication review clinics or information shops. A campaign must take into account personality differences and allow room for all types to become involved in the way they feel most relaxed. Volunteers have filled out evaluation sheets and the information gained will inform future programmes. This post match reflection is essential to ensure we are on the right track as we develop new initiatives around AAMW.

Would we do it again?

Yes. It took an enormous amount of time and energy but the grateful thanks of the many people who received our leaflets made the campaign worthwhile. It does not take a major leap of imagination to see that convincing patients of the need to ask questions, explaining how to ask questions and highlighting to professionals that the questions should be teased out and answered in a way that the patient understands is vitally important.

At the parliamentary launch of the week Rosie Winterton, minister of health, mentioned that some pharmacists would be approaching people at railway stations. This idea may sound unusual but we need to do something different. It is no longer acceptable to sit in our workplace and expect patients to come to us with a list of well thought out questions. As a profession we must be proactive in encouraging patients to talk to us. Some patients are educated, motivated and vocal but it is the silent majority we need to reach. This is not rocket science but for those who remain unconvinced that AAMW was useful I invite them to go out to the street and chat to the punters.

What did it do for pharmacists?

The experience of those who took part in Surrey will tell you that it made the public more aware of pharmacists’ skills, both clinical and communication, as well as highlighting their role as the scientists on the high street. The material given out will inevitably ensure that patients are better equipped to receive information about their medicines, which can only improve concordance in medicine taking.

Where to next?

Each primary care organisation can build on the momentum that the week initiated. The national AAMW organisation has produced a useful booklet, “Health and medicines information, guide and directory”. My PCT is sending copies to all GP practices, dentists, optometrists and pharmacies. The booklets are free (paid for by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry). Postage is £20 per 350.

Individual pharmacists must decide whether or not to involve themselves and their staff. Some pharmacy staff we met remained unaware of the campaign but agreed it was a good idea; others had a box of credit card leaflets at the back of their premises and wondered what they were for. There was a small cohort who considered this campaign was being imposed upon them and did not want to join in.

The only solutions to these problems would be to run the campaign again, and again, and again. It would be good to see television advertisements giving patients permission to ask their heath professional about medicines. There should be an expectation that all patients who receive prescription medicines or who buy them over the counter will receive a briefing, to their satisfaction, by a health professional or trained staff member. If this always occurred then we will have gone a long way to reduce waste and adverse events. Not all patients want to know about their medicines but all should be given the choice.

For further ideas, visit the web site www.medicines-partnership.org. Our local campaign involved a multidisciplinary team and has been achieved on a small budget. We consider it to have been a success and look forward to building on the lessons learnt from the week. This is only the beginning.

Back to Top


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal