| |
Articles
Pharmaceutical needs assessment - easier said than done?
By Sharon E Williams PhD, MRPharmS
This article looks at one way of going about a pharmaceutical
needs assessment
Needs assessment is the process of measuring health needs in a population.
It is fundamental to local commissioning of services and to effective
practice planning. It helps decision-makers to prioritise changes and
make the best use of resources in an evidence-based manner. Some of the
questions that may spring to mind when contemplating undertaking a pharmaceutical
needs assessment are why do it? Where to begin? and how to start?
Why do an assessment?
As any practice pharmacist will confirm, there are a myriad of pharmaceutical
services that can be provided (see Panel 1),1 yet
there has been a tendency for efforts to be concentrated on areas that
can realise immediate efficiency or cost savings. For example, by formulary
management or switching from proprietary to generic preparations.2
However, without some form of systematic evaluation of need, it is entirely
possible that greater unmet pharmaceutical needs within a practice (for
example, medication review, patient education or concordance problems)
have been sacrificed in favour of this quick fix approach.
Pharmaceutical needs assessment allows identification of the varying needs
of a practice population and assists the prioritisation, planning and
delivery of services in the most resource effective way. It introduces
openness and accountability into the process of service selection.
Where to start
A variety of techniques3-8 to assess health needs
have been used but as stated by McEwen et al,
there is no
single best method of assessing health needs different issues and
questions require different methods and approaches and degrees of detail
and different combinations of professionals to be involved.9
A pharmaceutical needs assessment method, designed for ease of use, has
recently been published, which includes a combination of techniques.1
These include gap analysis,3 the nominal
group technique,4 and rapid participatory
appraisal.5
In summary, through a four-stage process, which incorporates the views
of patients and their primary health care providers (GPs, nurses, community
pharmacists, practice administration staff), this method allows the construction
of a service priority league table, around which pharmaceutical
service provision within a practice can be planned.
Stage one comprises a face-to-face, semi-structured interview with patients
and primary health care professionals to determine their perceived need
for particular pharmaceutical services. Stage two is a postal questionnaire
to the various groups in stage one, which is designed to identify the
degree of desirability of varying pharmaceutical services identified at
stage one, as well as other services that were not identified in stage
one. Stage three is an open forum discussion of results from stages one
and two, where agreement is reached on an overall priority
league table based on patients and health care professionals
perceived needs. Finally, having identified and prioritised the areas
of pharmaceutical perceived need, the fourth stage of the assessment process
is to use the priority league table from stage three in the
final selection of pharmaceutical care to be provided. This method was
found to be successful in designing a pharmaceutical service for a six-partner
practice tailored to local need. This was preferable to implementing a
service on the basis of need expressed elsewhere. The approach used balanced
what should be done with what could be done and what could be afforded.
Importantly, it provided a formal mechanism for patients to have a say
in the service they received and opened up interprofessional communication
channels.
How to start
When considering undertaking a needs assessment for the first time it
is easy to become overwhelmed by the sheer volume of work but it is rather
like the old joke How do you eat an elephant? answer
piece by piece, this then raises the question Which
piece do you start with?
Some guiding principles are:
- Be focused in what you are trying to achieve. For example, do you
want to evaluate the need for all service provision or to prioritise
selected services?
- Construct a steering group made up of individuals who work in the
practice or practice area, have a particular knowledge, skill or expertise
or can represent local people and/or decision-makers
- Consider what resources will be needed to undertake the assessment
and where they will come from. For example, the patient postal survey
component of the aforementioned pharmaceutical needs assessment cost
£1,850. However, it was felt that this aspect of the pharmaceutical
needs assessment could be forfeited if time and resources were constrained,
as the results (from the postal survey) appeared to validate the range
of issues raised during the selected patient interviews in stage one
- Your needs assessment will be aiming to influence a decision or process,
so your project must be timed to produce the necessary results at the
right time. Identify when the decision process will take place and work
backwards from your deadline to produce a project management timetable
- Define the client groups you will be targeting in the assessment
and be clear why you have selected them.
The scope of this article is intended to give a flavour of why and how
to do a pharmaceutical needs assessment. Those intending to undertake
this type of assessment should refer to an original publication,1
which describes practical detail. Copies of the needs assessment tools
used at our primary care group are available on request.
Dr Williams is a senior research fellow in the department of general
practice and primary care, University of Aberdeen
References
| 1. Williams SE, Bond CM, Menzies CA. Pharmaceutical
needs assessment in a primary care setting. Br J Gen Prac 2000;50:95-9. |
| 2. Bond CM, Sinclair HK, Taylor RJ, Duffus P,
Reid J, Williams A. Pharmacists: a resource for general practice?
Int J Pharm Prac 1995;3:85-90. |
| 3. Dyck D. Gap analysis of health services. Am
Assoc Occupational Health Nursing Journal 1996;44:541-9. |
| 4. Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J, Bradshaw
C, Webb I. The nominal group technique: a research tool for general
practice. Family Practice 1993;10:76-81. |
| 5. Murray SA, Graham LJC. Practice-based health
needs assessment: use of four methods in a small neighbourhood. BMJ
1995;310:1443-48. |
| 6. Cohen D. Marginal analysis in practice: an
alternative to needs assessment for contracting health care. BMJ 1994;309:781-4. |
| 7. Hopton JL, Dlugolecka M. Patients perceptions
of need for primary health care services: useful for priority setting?
BMJ 1995;310:1237-40. |
| 8. Ruta DA, Duffy MC, Farquharson A, Young AM,
Gilmour FB, McElduff SP. Determining priorities for change in primary
care: the value of practice-based needs assessment. Br J Gen Prac
1997;47:353-7 |
| 9. McEwen J, Russell EM, Stewart S, Needs assessment
in Scottland: collaboration in public health. Public Health 1995;109:179-85 |
|