Int J Pharm Pract 2001:9:217-224
College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax,
Nova Scotia, Canada
David M. Gardner,
PharmD, assistant professor, college of pharmacy and department of
psychiatry
Andrea L. Murphy, pharmacy student
Allister K. Woodman, pharmacy student
Sarah Connelly, pharmacy student
Correspondence:
Professor Gardner, QEII HSC, AJLB 3005,
5909 Jubilee Rd, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 2E2
david.gardner@dal.ca
|
Original Papers
Community pharmacy services for antidepressant users
D. M. Gardner, A. L. Murphy, A. K. Woodman and S. Connelly
Objective To evaluate the communication and barriers
to communication between community-based pharmacists and antidepressant
users.
Method A survey package designed to evaluate the communication
between pharmacists and antidepressant users was distributed to 50 community
pharmacies. Each package included one pharmacist survey and 10 sealed antidepressant
user surveys to be distributed by the pharmacy staff. The survey addressed
the components of communication, level of satisfaction and barriers to effective
communication.
Setting Urban and rural community pharmacies in the
Canadian Maritime provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.
Key findings Overall, pharmacists rated the value of
their communication more highly than did antidepressant users, although
the difference was not statistically significant. When beginning treatment,
between one-half and two-thirds of antidepressant users recalled pharmacists
inquiring about past use of the antidepressant and discussing information
provided by the physician, time to onset of benefits and potential side
effects. The purpose of the antidepressant, target symptoms, usual duration
of therapy and risk of relapse with premature discontinuation were addressed
less often according to antidepressant users, and monitoring of compliance
was not a common activity. Antidepressant users estimated that initial communication
with the pharmacist generally lasted less than five minutes, and often less
than two minutes. However, pharmacists appeared to resolve misconceptions
and concerns about antidepressant use efficiently. According to pharmacists,
the major barrier to effective communication was a lack of privacy.
Conclusion Although compliance with antidepressants
is low and treatment outcomes are sub-optimal, pharmacists are not using
their opportunities to minimise this problem through effective communication
and follow-up. Pharmacists, pharmacy administrators and regulators need
to re-assess their contribution to this problem and how they can lead to
its resolution in the patient's best interest. |