Int J Pharm Pract 2002:10:225-33
Department of General Practice and Primary Care,
University of Aberdeen, Westburn Road, Aberdeen, Scotland AB25 2AY
Alison Fish, MSc, MRPharmS, research associate
Margaret C. Watson, PhD, MRPharmS, research fellow
Christine M. Bond, PhD, MRPharmS, professor of primary care (pharmacy)
Correspondence: Dr Watson
m.c.watson@abdn.ac.uk
|
Original Papers
Practice-based pharmaceutical services: a systematic review
ALISON FISH, MARGARET C. WATSON and CHRISTINE M. BOND
Background General
practice-based pharmaceutical services are increasingly common, ranging
from global medication changes (eg, generic switch) to individual patient
medication review and educational interventions.
Aim To conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of practice-based
pharmaceutical interventions.
Design A systematic review of general practice-based pharmaceutical
services.
Setting General practice in the UK, Australia, Canada, Scandinavia
and the US.
Outcome measures The effect and cost of practice-based pharmaceutical
services.
Methods Electronic databases were searched and pharmaceutical
organisations were contacted. Studies fulfilling the review criteria were
considered for inclusion. Duplicate independent data screening and abstraction
was undertaken. Three indicators were used to assess the quality of included
studies: method of random allocation; allocation concealment; and proportion
of subjects followed to the end of the study.
Results A total of 2,707 references were identified: 256 full
publications were retrieved and 16 randomised, controlled trials (RCTs)
met the inclusion criteria. Included studies assessed either the professional
interface (educational outreach and general prescribing advice) or the
patient interface (medication review and patient-specific prescribing advice).
Three trials included all three quality markers. Most studies were effective
in achieving one or more of the desired outcomes from pharmaceutical intervention.
Two trials showed no statistically significant differences between the
study and control groups post intervention.
Conclusions Many evaluations of practice-based pharmaceutical
services have been published but few meet recognised standards of trial
methodology. The results of this review suggest that practice-based pharmaceutical
services are effective in achieving desired changes; however, more robust
evidence is needed to confirm whether they are effective, efficient and
sustainable. |