Return to IJPP Home Page

IJPP 2003, 11: 47–54
© 2003 Int J Pharm Pract
Received July 15, 2002
Accepted January 28, 2003
DOI 10.1211/002235702892
ISSN 0961-7671

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen

Terry Porteous, research pharmacist
Christine Bond, professor of primary care (pharmacy)

Correspondence:
Mrs Porteous,
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen, Scotland AB25 2AY.
E-mail: t.porteous@abdn.ac.uk

Acknowledgments:
This study
was funded by Grampian Health Board. Thanks go to all Middlefield residents and professionals who responded to the questionnaire, to Novartis for supporting the nominal group meeting and to staff at the Healthy Hoose for their help and co-operation. Thanks also go to members of the steering group: Liz Davidson, nurse prescriber, Healthy Hoose; Fiona Ritchie, GP registrar, Calsayseat Medical Practice; Linda Juroszek, AICC lead pharmacist; Marlene Westland, health promotion worker; Janet Ollason and Sarah Gray, Grampian Health Board; Peter MacLean, acting programme and initiatives manager, AICC.

Original Papers

Novel provision of pharmacy services to a deprived area: a pharmaceutical needs assessment

Terry Porteous and Christine Bond

Abstract
ObjectiveTo conduct a pharmaceutical services needs assessment in a deprived area of Aberdeen and to inform the development of an innovative provision of these services, addressing local needs, to be delivered within an agreed budget.

Method A systematic consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. Preliminary content setting interviews informed the development of questionnaires which were mailed to residents (n ¼ 300) randomly selected from the electoral roll, and professionals (n ¼ 117). A nominal group of stakeholders (17 invitees) was used to prioritise the services identified from the questionnaire and identify barriers to their implementation.

Setting The setting was a deprived community in the city of Aberdeen, Scotland.

Key findings Questionnaire response rates were 53% and 74% for residents and professionals respectively. The majority of residents reported receiving a prescription from their GP at least annually (81%) and purchased over-the-counter (OTC) medicines (78%). The top five services required by residents were advice on minor illnesses and the use of OTC medicines, sales of first aid products and OTC medicines, and collection of prescribed medicines. The professionals additionally favoured advice on prescribed medicines and sales of baby products instead of collection of medicines and sales of first aid products. The nominal group was attended by nine people. Benefits of a pharmacy service in the area were identified as convenience and access to advice. There was concern about duplication of services with the established nurse practitioner. Concerns were also raised about security, particularly if drug misuse services were provided.

Conclusion The feasibility of using a systematic approach to identify services to address local need was demonstrated.

The full text of The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice is available via subscription — www.pharmpress.com or available online