Home > Official notices > Disciplinary Committee  |  Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 280 No 7489 p198-199
16 February 2008


Disciplinary Committee

The Disciplinary Committee of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society will meet at 1 Lambeth High Street, London SE1, on Monday 18, Tuesday 19, Wednesday 20, Thursday 21 and Friday 22 February 2008 at 9.30am to hear the following matters:

1. The allegation that the fitness to practise of Samuel Edwin Ashby (registration number R6879) is impaired by reason of a conviction on 11 April 2007 at the Inner London Crown Court of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, for which offence Mr Ashby was sentenced on 9 July 2007 to a term of 14 months’ imprisonment.

2. The inquiry ordered by the Statutory Committee into a complaint by the Council of the Society against Jayant Bhaichand Sanghvi (registration number 69303) which alleges that: the sale of 19 amoxicillin 250mg capsules without the authority of a prescription in an unlabelled brown pill bottle; a failure to give any or any proper oral directions regarding the use of the amoxicillin; and a failure to make an entry in the private prescriptions register in respect of the supply, may amount to misconduct.

3. The allegation that the fitness to practise of Paramjit Sheila Mander (registration number 82865) is impaired by reason of misconduct. It is alleged that on or about 6 June 2006 Ms Mander appropriated £60 belonging to the pharmacy at which she was employed, and on or about 10 July 2006 Ms Mander recorded that a locum pharmacist worked at the pharmacy when no such locum was present.

4. The inquiry ordered by the Statutory Committee into a complaint by the Council of the Society against Ian Elliott (registration number 65343) which alleges that: the dispensing of a Schedule 2 CD otherwise than in accordance with a valid prescription and otherwise than in accordance with Regulation 16(1) of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001; a failure to query with the prescriber a prescription which did not comply with Regulation 15 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001; and a failure to assess a prescription to determine its suitability for a patient, may amount to misconduct.

5. The inquiry ordered by the Statutory Committee into a complaint by the Council of the Society against Yakub Ismail Patel (registration number 65371) which alleges that: the failure to contact a patient’s wife regarding a previous dispensing error that Mr Patel had been made aware of; a failure to provide an explanation of what had happened to the patient’s wife; a failure to make arrangements for someone at the pharmacy to contact the patient’s wife regarding the error; and a failure to inform the superintendent pharmacist promptly of the error, may amount to misconduct.

Statutory Committees Secretariat

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal