Home > Official notices > Disciplinary Committee | Search
|
|
Disciplinary CommitteeThe Disciplinary Committee of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain met on Tuesday 26 February 2008 and made the following directions: 1. The committee granted an application for restoration to the Register
of Pharmacists from Chhaganbhai Dahyabbai Nathubhai Mistry (registration
number 66067). The committee directed that, in accordance with article
55(6) of the Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians Order 2007, Mr Mistry’s
registration should be conditional on his compliance with the following
requirements: that Mr Mistry works under the supervision of a pharmacist
for a period of two years; and Mr Mistry does not work as a superintendent
pharmacist for a period of three years. These conditions are subject
to review within 12 months. The Disciplinary Committee of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain met from Monday 3 to Friday 7 March 2008 and made the following directions: 1. The committee directed that the inquiries into William Mark
Howells (registration number 78354) and Barry
Maurice Brooks (registration number
75728) should not proceed. The committee adjourned the inquiry into Ghislaine
Elise Harrold (registration number 67551). The Disciplinary Committee will meet at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain on Monday 17, Tuesday 18, Wednesday 19 and Thursday 20 March 2008 at 9.30am to hear the following Statutory Committee inquiry: 1. A complaint by the Council of the Society against Kantilal Khushalbhai Mistry (registration number 74015) which alleges that: a failure to submit to the NHS Prescription Pricing Authority (“the PPA”) 18 FP10 prescription forms relating to low cost items; treating small value prescriptions as private prescriptions, but failing to keep a record of the sales or supplies made against those prescriptions; endorsing 18 NHS prescriptions to indicate that 18 packs of Benzamycin gel in quantities of 46.6g had been supplied when quantities of 23g had been supplied and submitting the wrongly endorsed prescriptions to the PPA for payment, resulting in overpayment; endorsing NHS prescriptions for Gaviscon Liquid, Oilatum, Liquid Paraffin and E45 Cream to indicate that small pack sizes had been dispensed, when in fact large pack sizes had been dispensed; submitting the wrongly endorsed prescriptions to the PPA for payment, resulting in overpayment; and, regularly dispensing duplicate prescriptions and submitting them to the PPA for payment without querying the prescribing practice, may amount to misconduct. Statutory Committees Secretariat |