|
|
Positive results from chlamydia screening
The concept of chlamydia screening in pharmacies is gaining momentum. The pharmacy White Paper “Pharmacy in England — building on strengths, delivering the future”, published earlier this month, stated that later in 2008, the Government will release a national template for primary care organisations outlining how to commission chlamydia screening services to community pharmacies. As part of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme, primary care organisations are now assessed by the Healthcare Commission on the percentage of 16–24 year olds in their area that are screened for infection. It is in the PCO’s interest to develop a chlamydia screening service that is easily accessible to the public. Raj Nutan, pharmacy
business manager at the National Pharmacy Association, suggests that
pharmacists who would like to offer such a service should contact
their PCO or local pharmaceutical committee. The NPA offers assistance
to
any pharmacies or LPCs that want to bid for a PCO-commissioned service. A pilot scheme run by Lambeth and Southwark primary care trusts, which started in August 2005, was England’s first to evaluate the feasibility of testing for and treating chlamydia in community pharmacies. The success of the pilot has led to the service being commissioned widely from pharmacies across the two PCTs. Screening kits are currently offered at 36 of the 61 pharmacies in the area, and so far six pharmacists have been trained to supply treatment.
New Park Pharmacy, Clapham Park, London, was one of the sites used for the Lambeth and Southwark pilot. During the first phase of the pilot, service users were required to have a consultation with the pharmacist before receiving the kit. Rimal Patel, a community pharmacist at the pharmacy, believes that offering initial counselling to users increases the likelihood that they will complete the test. However, Jo Holmes, head of primary care delivery and development at Southwark PCT, says that after analysis of the results of the pilot, the initial consultation proved not to be financially or operationally sustainable, due to the extra demand placed on pharmacists time. “Also, young people have told us they don’t want to be waiting around in the pharmacy for too long to obtain a test,” she adds. During the Lambeth and Southwark pilot, a time and motion study was conducted to calculate the appropriate fee for the commissioned service. Pharmacies are now paid £1 for issuing each test and £8 for supplying treatment to each infected patient. When the test is given out as part
of an emergency hormonal contraception (EHC) consultation, the pharmacy
receives £18 (increased from the standard rate of £15.45
for an EHC consultation). “Like all new services, delivering it will get easier with practice — the development of EHC supports this,” she says. During the pilot, 83 tests were performed in three sites over a three month period, and 9.5 per cent of those tested were shown to be infected.
If a service is commissioned, the cost of the tests
is paid for by the PCO. Pharmacists will need training to develop
the necessary competencies
to run the service. Currently, PCOs that have commissioned the service
to pharmacies will provide the necessary training, and some offer to
reimburse locum costs while the pharmacist attends the course. If any patient requires
a consultation to receive treatment, the pharmacy is paid £15 (or £20
if the patient is under 18 years old) and reimbursed with £8.95
to cover the cost of azithromycin. When all overheads are covered by the PCO, the service
generates profit for community pharmacies. It also increases the
footfall of young people
into your pharmacy, who may purchase other goods, says Ms Holmes. “The more testing kits you give
out, the more people will be screened,” she says. “If we
see a pharmacy is issuing a large number of tests, we are more likely
to offer to train them for the treatment service.” |