Home > TP (current issue) > Hospital careers sector
|
|
Hospital know-how |
|
Wasim Baqir, David Campbell, Alan Worsley and Rachel Etherington discuss a pilot programme that was set up for undergraduate students to experience hospital pharmacy |
Some time ago last year, pharmacy staff at Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust (NHCT) and lecturers from Sunderland University school of pharmacy expressed concerns that many hospital preregistration trainees started their posts without any practical experience of hospital pharmacy. Furthermore, many students do not apply for hospital posts because of possible misconceptions they might have about hospital pharmacy. NHCT pharmacy and Sunderland University school of pharmacy decided to develop a pilot programme for undergraduate students to gain an insight into hospital pharmacy. Senior pharmacists from NHCT and lecturers from Sunderland University school of pharmacy met to discuss the programme. It was agreed that the programme should be flexible with minimal structure so that members of the hospital pharmacy staff could adapt the teaching and experience around the needs of the student. It was agreed that the students would spend time with different types of NHCT pharmacy staff (pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and other support staff). Obtaining exposure to the many different staff types who work in pharmacy would help the students appreciate their roles, which is something that is not covered in the undergraduate course. NHCT pharmacy services are based at three sites (North Tyneside, Wansbeck and Hexham General Hospitals). It was agreed that initially 20 students in two cohorts of 10 students would be shared across the three hospitals — four at North Tyneside, four at Wansbeck and two at Hexham. The programme would involve the student spending a morning a week at his or her chosen hospital for six weeks. It was planned for the students to receive experience in a broad range of hospital pharmacy services (see Table 1). To ensure that the students got access to as many of these services as possible a timetable was developed for each site.
At the end of the six weeks, students and staff were asked to complete a questionnaire exploring their views of the programme. Eleven of the 20 students returned the questionnaires, with four being from North Tyneside, two from Hexham and five from Wansbeck. Table 2 shows questions and the student responses.
The students were asked to list the best and worst things about their experience. These were categorised. The best things were: The worst points were: Students were asked if they would make any changes to the programme. The main changes they would make were: 1. More time (many students suggested a whole day)
The pharmacy staff stated they would make the following changes to the programme: 1. More structured programme (with aims and objectives) A pragmatic, unstructured programme was used so that individual pharmacy mentors could tailor the experience around the student and the needs of the work-place. However, many of the staff wanted more definition for the programme. The organisers still believe that a rigid programme would be a barrier, however there are plans to introduce clear objectives for students and staff for the next cohort. Both staff and students enjoyed the programme and provided many positive responses. It was seen as a positive sign that students wanted to spend more time in the department. The main concerns from the staff will be addressed with the next cohort. Specifically, the programme will be limited to third- and fourth-year students. In summary, this hospital pharmacy experience programme, which has been easy to establish and implement using minimal resources, has proved to be successful, in terms of giving students an idea of how pharmacy operates and its role in the health care team. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||